Thread:OzzMan/@comment-23880286-20150823171654/@comment-23880286-20150823175833

OzzMan wrote: It's an old news post. I told you to leave it alone, and you just kept playing with it. It doesn't need to be edited, because it is a news post. The news it was meant to impart has already been imparted several years ago. It remains on the front page as an archive. How much clearer do you need this point made? Please define "kept playing with it". Does ONE edit, that was solely made because the thing it was linking to, count as "kept playing with it"? I respected your decision, and I didn't edit it anymore. If I had really wanted to "keep playing with it", I'd have edited it a few weeks ago, when I got back from vacation. And that's fine if you disagree, just undo my edit, no need to block me over it.

Also, if you want evidence that I wasn't edit warring, this is what I did after I got your message. I edited the same link that I had changed earlier, but I kept it in the way that it would lead to the wiki you wanted it to lead to. If I had wanted an edit war, I would have definitely changed the link back then, don't you think? This was a few weeks ago. Like I said, I only edited it today because the situation changed.

(By the way, admins shouldn't be able to decide what's best for the wiki on their own. I disagree with your point, and the only reason I respect it is because I don't feel like making a big deal out of it and you're a difficult person to talk with. You seem to not like having discussions at all. Otherwise I'd love having a discussion about whether it should be changed or not.)