Thread:Aptos/@comment-29834666-20160430182756/@comment-29834666-20160430220744

Aptos wrote: Minus "raison detre" the phrase, not the actual raison detre. Sorry, phone died and ur statement was very confusing. i don't entirely understand your question

(Smh) Argument of ignorance. You can not use an argument of ignorance, that is a logical fallacy. You have the burden of proof. But you have no proof either, do you?