Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26808654-20150315084726

(For those who believe that I'm talking about the deity, understand that when it comes to works of fiction the creators and writers are often referred to as god, that is the definition I am using)

Gems are not female.

Gems are sexless.

Gems are whatever you think/want them to be.

Gems are just gems.

Gems are dinosaurs.

Gems lack reproductive parts since they're sexless.

Rose got pregnant.

Gems have stated themselves to be female.

Gems are not lesbians.

Gems are whatever you think they are.

Gems do not perceive romance the way we do.

Ruby and Sapphire are in love.

A gem is going to die.

Gems can't die.

No one died.

Pearl was killed.

There's a fifty/fifty chance of them associating with one particular pronoun.

Literally every gem shown (save for Ruby) was called a "her."

Gems are whatever you see them as but are sexless so you can't consider them as any sex but you can consider them as dinosaur transgenders but the gems all call themselves female despite using the pronouns interchangeably so they are female so you can't call them guys but you can call them guys and can't be transgender since they lack reproductive parts to begin with and a sense of gender because they have no gender or sex despite claiming to be female and they don't perceive or express romantic feeling the same way humans do but Ruby and Sapphire were in love except they weren't in love and weren't lesbians because they lack genders despite Saphhire being called a girl but the gems are whatever you see them as so they could be a lesbian couple but they can't be because they aren't female because they lack genders and don't expressed/perceive romance the way we do unless you think they do in which case they do but they don't because gems aren't female and are sexless unless you think otherwise and if a person has a completely contradictory opinion they are right too because the gems are whatever anyone wants them to be except not because they're just gems. 