Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26037921-20150309212855/@comment-26217701-20150422020225

Luis G Cx wrote: Answer men wrote: ThePhilosophunculist wrote: Answer men wrote: Toyloli wrote: 2coolRaditz wrote Back on the subject at hand- Well, it depends on how you interpret it. I mean, we haven't seen much of Rose and the Gems together, so it's hard to draw a full conclusion, but it's a possibility. Although imo it would've probably been more one-sided, since Rose was in love with Greg and all. iT IS FULLY PLAUSIBLE  for relationships to not be the same in both directions. I said this before, and I say it again. I think Rose looked at all the gems as her children, but I don't say that they saw HER that way.

I totally do not blame people for thinking Pearl was in love with Rose. Rose clearly didn't feel 'that way' about Pearl but from the way Pearl has acted. Yeah. Pearl loved Rose and not as a mother. That's how I see it.

Garnet (Ruby/saphire) and Amethyst though I think saw her as their mum. I don't know why people think Pearl was in love with Rose, because that was never the case. Pearl only saw Rose as a mother not as a lover, and that is pretty much the fact. "That was never the case" "That is pretty much the fact"

Oh really now? Tell me more about how you know everything to do with how the creators built the relationships the CGs have with eachother. You must have some inside knowledge the creators don't even have, huh? Well to be honest Rose loved all Gems like they were her own little children, and it is possible for Gems to have relationships with one and another. This is why the Pearl X Steven thing was brought up. Steven x Any Gem is weird and just plain nasty. Steven compared to all the gems is a child. All the gems including Amethyst (even though she seems to be the youngest) are (5000+ year old to be more precise) adults. It is pedophilia. End of story.