Talk:Connie Maheswaran/@comment-39075325-20190604233103/@comment-37920634-20190605035417

It did belong to Steven and Steven's mother. Steven was not trained in the use of a sword had had no intention to. He gave Rose's Sword to Connie so that she could use it. It's not like Connie stole it. Steven wanted Connie to have it. If it was a family heirloom, and Steven was the inheritor of it, shouldn't he have the right to give it to one of his (if not the) cloest friends and companions. Especially, one who would use it responsibly in the legacy of his mother and ot protect Steven the inheritor?

Besides, Steven wasn't going to use it, he didn't know how to wield a sword, and showed no intention of doing so. Wouldn't it make sense to be put ot use by Connie of all people (especially for the reasons I have already mentioned above)?

Sorry if I'm coming off as confrontational. Just confused on why anyone would be mad about this and trying to explain my point of view on the matter in hopes it makes you less mad.