Talk:Fluorite/@comment-28864719-20170530211410/@comment-15501354-20170530224704

 I don't mean to condescend, but if you aren't aware of what polyamory is, it is a catchall term for any romantic relationship open to an indefinite number of partners. They are polyamorous relationships between three people where all three are with the other two, or only one is involved with the other two. I, myself, am not open to the idea of polyamory,  for myself . It doesn't make sense to me either. However, I don’t feel I have the right to judge a relationship between any number of consenting adults. I think of it this way: I am bisexual. It doesn't make sense to me that a straight or gay person can only be romantically attracted to one sex or one gender, but that doesn't mean I don't believe that sexuality to be valid. It's my understanding that polyamory can be confusing for some people, and it certainly isn't mandatory for all people. Polyamory doesn't inherently make the relationship any less healthy.

 Also, these are not your "useless thoughts" characters like Fluorite are meant to start a dialogue like this, so that people can learn.

 @Mineblock5000 Well, I don't think any non-permanent fusions are relevant to the discussion anyway. Garnet has repeatedly been shown to be a physical manifestation of the romantic love between Ruby and Sapphire. The same goes for Rhodonite. Topaz as well, although we only saw it for a moment. Becuase those are also all the perma-fusions we've seen, I assume perma-fusion is synonymous with romantic love.