Thread:Cheeseskates/@comment-32175182-20170722104253/@comment-5956954-20170722134718

My input existed because your apology comment was a pretense to the earlier sarcasm, which was necessary as a caution to you that choosing the proper wording is important for proper communication and excuses do not work (if you knew you were responsible for the account, then why would you say your brother did it as if it is meant to soften what you have done? It either meant your brother really did do it, in which case is more likely false due to abductive reasoning, or it meant nothing and was also off-topic to the thread).

This is also true when I gave context that you used another's as a base despite you saying it is "yours", having people assume without personal research it is indeed yours as a whole (no distinction or modification mentioned in the post, so it's a default assumption that waits for confirmation). It is a common mistake that happens in schools as well when one wants to cite work to avoid plagiarism or perhaps cannot because they could not find the original work, assuming it is original.

To give a caution is to let the user know how they can prevent themselves from being seen as an otherwise aggressive member. It does not matter if it is irrelevant to the thread in that case. It needed to be mentioned whether it benefitted the short-term of the thread or not.

Anyways, I'll continue to do as I may with the awareness of your disapproval (and so, be more cautious of your wants in the future and now) as you requested, but if I feel something needs to be added, then I will not hesitate. I just want you to know that as I and everyone else has that liberty on the wiki and on public threads.

That is all.