Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26037921-20150309212855/@comment-10583149-20150417023418

Jaydom Studios wrote: Mew The Creator wrote: Airbenderedacted wrote: Son of Nemesis34 wrote:

Jaydom Studios wrote:

Claowyn wrote: Jayden, your point is invalid. Consider this; if a genderless being of great power chose the form of a woman when they appear infront of you, are they still genderless or a woman? They're genderless, but if they love other genderless people they are gay. why are you so determined to label characters as gay? Why is everyone else so determined to label queer-coded characters as not being gay? Sure, they're coded that way, I never denied that. But they're not.

Ruby and Sapphire are coded as lesbian characters, that much is obvious. But they're not. Gems are a genderless, sexless species. There is no gender or sex, therefore, there is no sexual orientation.

Also, the term you're looking for is lesbian, not gay. We actually have no idea how gems are born. We know that they can most likely still do it, as Peridot was reguarded as "a new gem". You've never actually seen a gem being born, therefore your argument is invalid.

I am not looking for "lesbian", as "gay" works for women too. Get off your high horse and buy a dictionary. http://ianjq.tumblr.com/post/113794156834/i-know-that-the-gems-are-sexless-agendered-etc

Gems produce asexually. Word of God says. They can "do it", but the only gem so far to have been seen performing the action was Rose.