Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26037921-20150309212855/@comment-26283061-20150420062457

Toyloli wrote: 2coolRaditz wrote:But there isn't a gender for them to share that would make them 'homo'romantic. There's a word for it, I bet, but I can't think of it. The corrects terms are monosexual, and their just. Romantic. When a species only has one gender you don't need to apply terms like gay or homo. They're but implied and also unapplicable.

I don't think they'd actually have a sexual or romantic orientation if they were attracted to other Gems. If they don't have a gender they wouldn't have different sexualities. So yeah, I'd go with that.

Back on the subject at hand- Well, it depends on how you interpret it. I mean, we haven't seen much of Rose and the Gems together, so it's hard to draw a full conclusion, but it's a possibility. Although imo it would've probably been more one-sided, since Rose was in love with Greg and all.