Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-675805-20150505021317/@comment-28584561-20150510065357

Mattwo wrote: How? I backed it all up with solid evidence. Well, laying claim to what a "perfect fusion" would look like is as much as a speculation as it gets. If there is such a thing as a 'perfect fusion". Garnet's ufsion is really stable but can we really say it's near perfect? Or for that matter, Stevonnie? The info we currently have on fusion is sorely lacking. We can say that a strong bond and a healthy relationship greatly increases the chances of their fusion being really stable but we can't really say that they are perfect or near perfect. There are so many variables to take into account onto what can make a "perfect fusion", relationships might just be the tip of the iceberg.

While this theory isn't exactly wild, it isn't the most solid as well. I'd rank this theory up with the "Rose is pink diamond" theory, it has a lot of evidence to back it up but it also has many holes.