Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25539649-20150510212536/@comment-26189598-20150527054612

Gnx486 wrote: Be honest, are you trolling right now? The emblem on the ship, the carvings in the temple walls, you do realize I made those exact connection in my initial post, right? You're talking out of your ass, dude. Your grasp on the things I've been saying is as flimsy as this "master of fan-theories" delusion you've got going on.

What I can't figure out is why you're being so adamant about this. I'm only responding because you keep addressing me about this and it's funny, but why do you keep pressing this? You took someone's theory, which cited multiple elements from the show to support itself, and basically said "That's wrong because my theory is different read my blog", and you've held to that standard in your subsequent responses. It was a stupid response, we all make them sometimes, it's time to move on. The dude who started this thread has already asked that the matter be dropped. Yes, but you didn't think about it carefully enough, because you also beleive that the statue of a heavyset woman with long hair is a representation of Blue Diamond, a character with a slim build and a spiky hairstyle. And your basis for your theory is, "Yellow Diamond's associated with the Sun, so Blue Diamond should be associated with the Moon, therefore the moon goddess statue is a representation of her even though they have completely different appearences also, the gemstone the statue's holding does look like the lighthouse ghost's gemstone even though they aren't the same color ." is insane and invalid. Maybe your the one talking out of your ass. Also, the three dimensional shape of the gemstone is irrelevant when you look at the way it's exposed. For example, take a look at the gemstone on the obelisk. It's squarish not triangular unlike the three diamonds' gemstones from the mural, but you'd already know that if you actually took the time to read the freaking blog post carefully.

As for the second part, trying to smear and misrepresent me is a very pathetic attempt at winning an argument. What I did was take someone's theory, and proved it wrong with overlooked evidence from the show and elsewhere. I'm just trying to correct people who hold these misconceptions, and show them what's factually right. And one more thing, your the one who's been making the majority of stupid responses here, not me, because you are unwilling to change your views no matter what contradictary evidence arrises. Now think about what I said carefully, and maybe we can end this fued.