Talk:Emerald/@comment-36098271-20180911102610/@comment-26618197-20180911133913

Here's what they said:

"Can not it be another kind of diamond? There are three types of diamonds, for now, Whit which is the supreme Diamond, Blue and Yellow which are the type of Diamond that precedes that of White and finally that of Pink. From the picture that has his full figure is a stature very similar to that pink, a normal gem and has the classic small stature and can not have the size of a Diamond. And then, from what we understand, Pink would seem to be the "daughter" of Blue and Yellow, or White precisely. We also know that it is the only gem of its kind, together with bismuth, carnelian, blue holly, lapis lazuli and watermelon tourmaline. So all these gems can not be mergers? In short, the only gem that we currently know with the same stature as Garnet and Bismuth, and Garnet is a fusion. Bismuth, as well as Garnet, possesses a difficult character as if it were controlled by two gems, in Bismuth prevail boldness and glory, and we have also seen a side of wisdom in Bismuth. The side of audacity and glory can belong to a ruby ​​or a jasper, the side of wisdom to a simpler gem like a sapphire, for example. However, according to some of my theories, Emerald could very well also be a merger."