Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-5986698-20150313003322/@comment-26262244-20150331015935

MysticNerd wrote: Tocoleft wrote: I know I'm late and all but my views on the whole homosexual role that sapphire and Ruby play is overly obvious. I keep reading that people believe the gems have no gender but then if that were true how would rose be able to carry a baby or by that logic even have sex with a man to produce a baby, also ruby is not a boy because we have already seen that every other gem other than Steven is a girl and even if ruby is a boy and sapphire a girl then together both the male urges from ruby and the femininity from sapphire would make garnet a lesbian logically speaking... First, this is nothing against gay people. Anyways, Gems can reproduce with any gender. She did it by shapeshifting the proper organs, since gems don't have actual reproductive organs. Thats why she had to sacrifice herself for steven to be borm. Also, they speak english and we only have pronons to reffer to someone that are gender specific, so they have to chose one of them. They all chose to be women to make simpler, I geuss. Its all been confirmed by the writers. If they wanted to make it simplerl, why the hell didn't they just give them genders?

They don't have to have genitalia, just those 2 X chromosomes to make the difference; that way we'd have both male and female Gems, and they could still fall in love without sex.