Talk:Mystery Girl/@comment-972068-20160910031941/@comment-5642360-20160910053946

That's the point. If they wanted to flesh out S. more in her debut episode, they could've. But they didn't, and for a reason. That reason being a literal teaser. They're obviously going to show her again, albeit with more depth.

Also, you keep calling her a Mary Sue when her only appearance is a non-speaking cameo that showcases nothing of who she is. How can she stop being a Mary Sue when she never started to be one? Oh wow, she can drive a motorcycle, she's pretty much a Mary Sue.

And again you keep saying that it has undone everything that Pearl has done to get over Rose. When S.'s only appearance is a non-speaking cameo that showcases nothing of who she is and the little fact that Pearl likes her for maybe obvious, or maybe not, reasons.


 * "Also she only exists to be a love interest. If your character's only purpose is to fall in love with another character, then she's not a character. She's a token." + "If Pearl is really "moving on" from Rose, then she wouldn't have fallen for a girl who reminds her of Rose."

Wait, are you a writer for the show? Because right now you are making assumptions on things that are just making you angry. Because S.'s only appearance is a non-speaking cameo that showcases nothing of who she is. And as it stands, your saltiness isn't caused by the show's writers but yourself.

Well, I guess judging a character who's only appearance is a non-speaking cameo that showcases nothing of who she is, can do that to you.