Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26248252-20150418023438/@comment-26217701-20150423013459

@Hublijhar Me saying "Yet there's still a need for a "male" gem, huh?" =/= Me saying "Hublijhar said there's a need for a "male gem." There's a difference. Where did anyone call you sexist though? Did anyone actually type "Hublijhar is a sexist and hates women!!!!1111"? No.

@A man of questionable sanity That's what I'm saying.

As cool as the idea of a "male" gem sounds it is literally the most unnecesary thing ever. All the gems could be "female" but they're all going to be completely different (As evident by the different personality types we've seen so far). We've literally seen 7 gems, not counting Steven since he's a hybrid, that were completely different. Making a gem "male" wouldn't add diversity to the story because guess what?! It's already incredibly diverse.