Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25623698-20150525222906

Here's my idea: Let's take Alexandrite for starters: Top gloves; Blue (Pearl; Middle gloves: Lavender (Amethyst); Bottom gloves; Red (Garnet). I'm thinking that Each pair of arms directly correlates to the position of the gemstones on the gem. COnfused?

Pearl's gem is at the higest point for a gem: her head. Not on that, her forehead. Therefore the top arms are controlled by Pearl.

Amethyst's is at the second highest point for a gem: Her chest. Directly below her head, and usually above her hands. Therefore the middle arms are controlled by Amethyst.

Garnet's gems are at the second lowest point for a gem: her hands, which usually fall under the head and chest. There fore, the bottom arms are controlled by Garnet.

Heck, let's throw Rose in there. Rose's gem is at the lowest point for a Gem (or Crystal Gem, if you wanna get picky), so the bottom arms would be hers.

Now, I have no idea if this applies to Malachite, but it does apply to Stevonnie and Garnet.

Stevonnie: Steven has his mom's gem. Connie doesn't have a gem. Therefore, there is only one pair of arms to correlate the gem.

Garnet: Ruby and Sapphire's gems are at the exact same location, excluding that are on opposite sides. There doesn't really need to be another pair of arms.

I'm totally willing to argue this point, and I'd love to hear what you guys have to say! 