Talk:Jasper/@comment-29065959-20161230204909/@comment-26457410-20170104083148

"I never said that all artist want their name on their works wherever they may be posted. Hence why the word "a lot" denotes some rather than all."

Actually no, I did not attack your assumption about "all" artists but rather your assumption there is a lot when in reality there is but a few that actually do mark their work. What I was trying say is that I don't care about what other people think about my obligation statement. What I do care was how you were going to explain why you disagree with my first comment since you've never explain why you took issue with it in the first place. If it's still cause of X amount of people that supposedly disagree with me then that's just sheepish on your part.

The rest of your paragraph I'm not going to respond since it's just points/insinuations that were never made. So nice try, but you did not succeed in your attempt to misrepresent what was said.

"Same to you, friend. I never really said what my view on human nature was, rather I simply opted that I didn't find courtesy in it. But I guess you can completely see a person's world view from a few words off of an anonymous comment section."

You're misconstruing view as worldview. I did not claim that your entire opinion on human nature was simplistic, but rather your specific opinion on the courtesy statement which is still simplistic and absolute in this discussion. One can only assume that you're either a) you don't know what you're talking about when you brought up human nature, b) You're using human nature as a rhetorical device to your further your point with no regards of it being true or not, c) You actually do believe what you mean, but your human nature is different then my or others human natures.

"Because if you read hard enough, you'll see that I merely stated that since I don't find courtesy in human nature, I am OK with him/her just posting art (so long as they're not falsely claiming it) and not giving credit, since as you've said, it's pretty much just courtesy. And that I can't just delete the OP's post nor any of the comments since people have a right to post whatever they want (while still following rules)"

You just contradict yourself in that believing that there is no courtesy in human nature, but then say it exist without stating why that is so. That's just hilarious, but even given what you have said you've just concluded that you're in agreement with me in not deleting anyone's post here. That's perfectly with me but why the knee jerk? That's what I basically said in both comments so it's really just repetitive at this point.

TL;DR If you're going take issue with my first comment then explain yourself sir, don't just say "other people" when disagreeing with someone.