Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26342283-20150426230124/@comment-15984194-20150516010338

Owenbretts wrote: Hublijhar wrote:

Owenbretts wrote: Since Steven has both human and gem DNA its possible that there could be a whole new gem to be created or at least the child would have some gem powers even without a gem. Steven's child would need to have a gem in order to have gem powers, and since there would be no way for Steven to pass his gem to his child, the son/daughter would just be an average human being. It is also very unlikely that the offspring would manifest it's own gem.

The gems are the gem's source of power, energy, and everything the gem is. Theoretically speaking, if a gem lost its gem and continued to live, it wouldn't have all of its gem powers and it would essentially be a boring old fleshy meat-bag, (but in reality if a gem lost it's gem it would die or become corrupt).

PS: Gems don't have DNA. Everything that has a physical form has DNA. Thats how Steven is a gem and no just a human, Rose passed her gem DNA and it fused with Greg's human DNA and it gave Steven the ability to have and use Rose's gem. Also, if you check out one of my theorys (cant be bothered to put the link in), the way a kindergarten works is by injecting Gem DNA into plain old gemstones. Also, just thought of this, Steven and Connie could combine thier passed on DNA with some of Steven's gem DNA and inject it into a gemstone of his/Connie's choosing, and it could grow and could create a semi-perminate form, like Steven's form, and be a 1/2 or 1/4 gem/human hybrid

Not everything that has a physical form has DNA. A rock and a computer have physical forms, but they are not made of DNA. If you mean that everything that is a living thing has DNA, that is a different story. All things alive that we know of use DNA. But we haven't found life on any other planets, so we wouldn't know whether this is universal for all life or something particular to earth life.