Thread:Sapphireandruby1/@comment-25390652-20151113194054/@comment-25390652-20151117092947

Heinsk wrote: If it was a grammar mistake I don't think is a useless edit. Come on, guys. I think we should establish an appropiate criteria for edit hunting or badge hunting. The fact someone adds/removes a missing/unnecessary dot or comma or any symbol at all doesn't make it an unnecessary edit. That just means the guy actually did read the article letter by letter, which is cool to me. In the first link the dot was needed as you can see on the official U.S. Army site. For the second link, the template was inserted in the heading.

It's not like the user was banned for no reasons earlier, right?

Note: The warning was used to prevent this type of edits, because I don't want to get Sapphireandruby banned, don't claim me as some kind of a strict piece of grouch.

And right now I have no claims to your recent edits. Thanks, Sapphireandruby (not sarcastic).