Thread:GarThorTmk/@comment-34471622-20190221235404/@comment-5956954-20190222083958

GarThorTmk wrote: Can you please send me a link to the deleted page so I can work it up to the standards prescribed in the standards document and/or post a community poll to add the page. I cannot link you to the deleted page because it can only be viewed by persons with the ability to delete and restore pages in the first place: Patrollers and Administrators and hybrid staff including their abilities. What I can do, however, is post the source code for you to copy-paste into a userspace sandbox page for your experimentation. You can continue working the page on your sandbox until it is ready for presentation.

GarThorTmk wrote: I notice at the time of writing, the section for objects is still a stub, and there is no stub for vehicles. I am curious if this is intentional, and look forward to reading whatever those requirements might be, because that is particularly where I am interested in contributing in the near future. I never considered "vehicles" and only objects, and even then, that lacks development. Feel free to develop the criteria page more if you wish. I haven't gotten to it in a while.

GarThorTmk wrote: Again, I apologise for any over reaction real or percieved I may have had. It was not my intention to create so much strife. Forgiven. One more thing I should let you know is Sophiedp's comment you removed is still a valid caution you should consider. Understanding that, I believe we are done and have things resolved as much as they can be for this period.

Thanks for talking, and to a better future.