Talk:Garnet/@comment-28584561-20140907105702/@comment-28584561-20141020022844

"  those are BOTH of her gemstones"

Technically, yes both of those gems are Garnet's, the same logic that all gems on Opal/Sugilite are theirs

"all fusion gems have more then one gem in two different locations, take Sugilite for example, she has a gem on her chest, and two gems on her hands" 

that's because they are placed on locations where the fusers gem originally was. And I'm pretty sure that the left and the right palms of your hands are two entirely separate locations, one can argue that the base gems to form garnet had a blue triangle-faceted gem on their left hand and another gem having a red square-faceted gem on their right hand and if they fuse, they form Garnet having TWO gemstones at two entirely DIFFERENT locations.

​" ''not only that but fusion gems have FOUR ARMS. There is NO WAY around NOT having four arms." ''

One word. SHAPESHIFFTING.

"The fusion gem would ALSO be larger in size, combining the physical attributes of EACH GEM THAT WAS FUSED."

Very subjective, as we have not seen the base gems used in order to fuse into Garnet if she really is a fusion Gem.

"The Gems on the Temple door ARE HERS."

Yes they are.

"Yes, IT'S BLUE."

Yes it is.

" IT IS GARNET'S. GARNET IS EVEN SEEN USING IT."

In the same sense that Opal/Sugilite can use Amethyst's and Pearl's/Amethyst's and Garnet's doors.

P.S. I am not fully convinced Garnet is a fusion gem either I'm just having doubts that she is a pure gem