Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26248252-20150418023438/@comment-26217701-20150423142328

The thing about the diversity of the gems is that it doesn't matter whether they're physically/sexually diverse because it wouldn't serve a purpose. A male gem in a world of female gems wouldn't serve a purpose and the same goes for the reserve. It wouldn't do anything for the species. And I can't find the specific post/topic but all the gems are the same, which I'm assuming to mean sentient rocks that take on pronouns that they want.

I don't have any good or bad opinion of anyone on here unless they attack others or myself. I'm just here to discuss and sometimes agree and disagree with people and back myself up.

I don't actually believe your sexist but just your way of saying some things (if all gems were female it WILL eventually get boring) sounds that way (because it sounds like you're saying a male gem would be otherwise) but I still don't think of you as sexist.

And I'm not offeneded at all. It just bugs me personally that people want there to be a male gem when it wouldn't change anything. it'd just be a male gem. That's all, just a male gem. After a while that would probably get boring. Heck, you could add an animal gem and eventually that would probably get boring too.