Thread:Perlen297/@comment-27304481-20160213144944/@comment-27304481-20160216151931

Perlen297 wrote: Well, the users who got used in the discussion wouldn't feel the same as the users outside it.

Actually, there were never "boils down" in the discussion, except for new-comers in the thread and just express their opinion bluntly, and then leave, comes back and ask why is that still a thing.

For someone who were in touch with the topic, I'd say it was interesting. I've learned a lot from Aptos (yep, I mean it), came up with new interesting things and discoveries (those parallels, subtle things, and many more) as we went down.

It's way more beyond than a debate, an argument. It was an exploration.

Surprisingly for "just a thread", it inspired me, with a motivation from a friend, I learned that I'm surprisingly good at writing. In which I planned to write another relationship analysis, about Ruby and Sapphire, no worries, it's an essay, not a thread.

Annoying, too much, too far, some say. But it's not what you think it was, once you join in. And of course if it's one of your interest, you'll definitely enjoy and keep in touch.

This is why I requested to keep the discussion running. As one of the staff on this wiki, and the thread's host, of course I maintain the harmony in the discussion, which is another reason why the thread kept running without much violations in the policy.

It's not wrong, it was misunderstood.

I did not just waste 2 notebooks full of writing for nothing.

(came up all of these on the spot, yeah, praise me! praise me! :3) Two notebooks!? That's a lot. You could probably tell, but I came up with what I said on the spot. Doesn't that explain the lack of eloquence?