Board Thread:Off-topic/@comment-15675979-20160324132829/@comment-27304481-20160326055708

Perlen297 wrote: Aptos wrote: It does not.

Then the results themselves of that thread do not affect it, simply the methods of which you find them. As for innocent romance and unconcious romantic feelings, I am aware of what they are, and eagerly await the next statement on the subject to discuss them to clarify their true nature. Lol, or does it? (Seriously tho, cant you take subtlety)

Oh really? Then what is it? Because for the longest time, its like youre expecting us to prove that SxC have extracagant outright clicheful romance. Romance is different more or lesson chuldren, especially best friends. Its still a developing early innocent romance (not fully bloomed), same for RxS in the answer. Quasiromance. Not to mention that nothing is confessed, yet. No, i dont believe it has effect. I suppose if you had some exfreme confirmg evidence for both threads and decided not to tell us, i suppose.

And I dont expect clicheful romance. Or extravagant. Or outright. In fact, i expect non cliche, non extravagant romance. What I am expecting is rational, sensible explanation as to why they can't be platonic, that doesn't require one to listen to their heart and then force it to try and conform to society.

As for innocent developing romance, perhaps it could also be development into romance? They are similar, but highly different. One has one slowly growing more intimate as people, eventually blooming into romantic feelings. The other involves one slowly growing more intimate romantically, until it becomes fully bloomed and assured romantic love. Highyl distinct. While ruby and sapphire may be having innocent romance, steven and connie could have development to romance.