Thread:Killer365/@comment-4224349-20150124200318/@comment-25306382-20150127041959

Lilduders wrote: Superluigi6 wrote: Jay T. Dawgzone wrote: Superluigi6 wrote: Lilduders wrote: Judgekoo wrote: (technically I'm a patroller, IDK why honestly) Wait a second, I didn't think you were and when I checked the user rights log I found this:

KnightPearl, I'm almost 100% certain you did not get permission to promote Judgekoo. Jay might have said that Judge would be a good patroller, and I do agree, but that doesn't grant you permission to just promote Judge yourself. You should have gotten Killer's and/or Luigi's permission to do this.

If you didn't get permission to do this, and with you threatening bans and chat kicks over small things that could easily be solved with words, then that can be seen as a major abuse of power. I'm honestly thinking that I wouldn't want a bureaucrat who would do these sort of things. Your job is to enforce the rules and make the Wiki an enjoyable place, not deliver unneeded bans and promote others without the ok.

Judgekoo, I'm going to demote you. I am not doing this in a harsh way. KnightPearl did not inform any of the staff, and if I'm correct the bueros agreed on just having 2 patrollers (even though only one is active). I'm gonna be the other one after I'm demoted, right? Jay, we never decided on you being a patroller. After you restore to rollback on Thursday, that is our current plan. We want to take a break from new staff, because of how many new people are just joining the staff (Andrey, Finn) and because of the people just being upgraded (me, AS, etc). Who is the second patroller? Flambo asked to be demoted and Catboss hasn't been on for about a month and maybe two.

I don't think an inactive user should be promoted. And if I ever get the chance to be patroller, I suggest Emercrump to take the open rollback position, he seems to be a very qualified user for the position and has met all the requirements for rollback.