Thread:Aptos/@comment-27847292-20160325014116/@comment-15675979-20160403102843

Aptos wrote: Proving evidence is provided?

Settling that whole love at first sight deboccle.

The garnet rule. Love takes time and takes work. That beginning interaction of garnet and stevonnie wouldnt count then.

Fall in love again? What?
 * P (just let yourself suffer from my subtlety)

It's pretty much Infatuation at first sight, that Garnet is talking about, the traditional love at first sight. But she could be also be referring to true love. Well, it's true that true love takes time and takes work, and it doesn't exist from first sight.

Just because there's a "rule" doesn't mean everyone follow it. Also, there were never love at first sight, since they fell in love in the later part, and again, not in first sight. Ironically and unironically, they reinforced that rule, for they are fusion of love, from love that takes time and takes work. But every love begin at one point.

Why and How does people fall in love, again? (woops, forgot the comma... what my teacher said is true after all...)