Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26808654-20150516082728/@comment-26839914-20150731044846

Well, since it's it's my first thread, just wanted to say that I read the majority of all of these comments. Most of them being filler or random stuff towards the end, that was nonsensically volatile in regards to the argument of the show's flaws. I get it, people have opinions, but there wasn't a need to be so critical about what others have to say. Or, at least, incredibly harsh as most were at the start.

Yes, I revivied the thread. Call me the Retributionist.

Anyways, I would like to add my own input. The whole thing about the show being marketed to children and preteens is kinda bogus to an extent, where there are alot of themes, whether noticable or quite hidden, in the show Adventure Time and Regular Show. Steven Universe has every regard to be like that as well. ( This is kind of why I disliked Clarence or Uncle Grandpa). Back to the topic, alot of these episodes can every be quite emotional or dramatic, meaning it can be for alot of people. Thus, I can understand the issue of all of these "filler episodes", yet we must consider how the show is processed. Refined even. Rebecca Sugar and the other creators appeal to many age, social, sexual groups all together. To expand to such a wide audience if phenomenal, especially with the large oversaturation of Teen Titans GO these days. Basically, what I'm trying to say, that the critique is reasonable to an extent, but the vocabulary/ structure came off very stron and a bit more credit is due. (First post :D)