Thread:CrystalMomSquad/@comment-5956954-20170727011309/@comment-5956954-20170727043134

"That page you linked is not a summary."

The edit is a rewrite of something much like my rewrites to the summaries, so the edit has been presented appropriately.

"Other users and myself felt as the edits you made to the summaries were not needed"

Understandable. Doesn't mean I have to agree just so I am not talked to about why my edit is wrong from various angles and persons, causing an argumentum ad populum to the readers and parties involved.

It also does not matter if something is needed or not as long as it makes something better. If one does not think this way, then the wiki is going to stagnate and not improve itself because it is not allowing anything. It is encouraged for editors to be bold in that regard.

"specficaly 'Both Parties' (It doesn't flow very well and can be debated upon there being two partys during the trial.)"

"both parties" flows perfectly well, and this is coming from a native English speaker with an American accent. What does not flow well is you saying, "can be debated upon there being two parties during the trial" when it could be, "It doesn't flow very well and can be debated by others if there were only two parties during the trial" (if I get the context of the sentence correctly). I also didn't use "both parties." I used "the parties involved," and the term, along with the word itself, is very common within the legal system to refer to the persons involved in any legal affair. Sorry if I do not agree here, but I am not seeing anything convincing that is reasonably going against my own studies.

"I hope you understand why your edits were reverted!"

Honestly, I do not. I asked you to explain your edit summaries and what I asked in the OP comment in detail since this is the area where there is no unreasonable text limit. I wanted to know what made the grammar "choppy" that warranted a complete revert of my edit. I wanted to know why my own summaries, while being only a couple of words longer, are not better and more accurate than the previous. I did not get an answer for them. I did not get an in-depth insight into why an edit is being reverted so I may discuss with the reverter about it and improve the both of us. Overall, it was an edit that was reverted completely for an incomplete and unjust reason.

I'm coming out of school soon, so we will chat on Discord if you are interested. Overall, I see no reason to revert the edits.