Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26037921-20150309212855/@comment-26285761-20150525070517

Rocky55 wrote: Ugh I give up. Do you people turn your mind off when you are watching this show or are you deliberately trolling these good people who are trying to explain the subtle cases of character development and interactions.

I will say this last time. Yes Pearl had romatic feelings for Rose but it was platonic. Those who say otherwise remind me of the brilliant people who said "Ruby and Sapphire are just good friends" after Garnet sang a whole song about her relationship. It is all there  people and it is not vague at all.

StevenXLapis will never become a thing because it goes against everything this series has stood for.

I will leave this thread and urge other people to do the same. Some people just refuse to see what is in front of them. This is what I hate about Internet debates: people insulting other people. Dude.(Just an expression, in case you're a girl, so don't blow up.) We don't need to hear you flaming. We want actual relevance to the topic. This contributed almost nothing. All it did was say, "I don't think so. I don't ship Steven and Lapis either. I also sound like a jerk right now because I just plagued everyone with insults repetitively."

"Yes Pearl had romantic feelings for Rose but it was platonic"? Ignoring the brilliance of grammar, being platonic is not a form of romantic. Romantic means something different than platonic altogether.

Besides, I don't ship Lapis and Steven, but what does that mean "everything this series has stood for"?

I know this didn't really contribue much to the topic, but I felt this needed to be addressed and did include a question, as well as addressing the technical status of Rose and Pearl's relationship: close but platonic, because there is nothing to prove it otherwise and no heavy hints either.