Talk:Stevonnie/@comment-25839649-20150123144612

Boys and Girls are not defined by their looks, even though generally you can tell what they are by them; the facial features, the eye-lashes, the hair, shoulders; Some people tend to focus more on the aspects i'd rather not mention because of reasons........

With that said, here's the thing. Boys and Girls are also not defined by how they act. If boys act like girls, they're still boys. And vice versa.

Boys and Girls, like literally all things, are defined by genes. You are girl if you are born with an 'x' and a 'y' gene. You are a boy if it is just an 'x' gene. You cannot switch them around. They're genes. You cannot change them, no matter how much you may want to. And you can't be both.

Which is why Stevonnie, as well as the Gems, makes things complicated. And is why we have debates. With Stevonnie, there is probably a more dominant gene that would decide whether she is a boy or a girl. (geez I sound like Proffessor Oak) And since generally the males were attracted to her, we can say that her female genes are more dominant. But we don't know. That is why it is up for debate.