Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26285761-20150702074516/@comment-26285761-20150704060230

Gordon Ecker wrote: The Most Interesting Nobody in the World wrote: Gordon Ecker wrote: Why should we use a weird, uncommon and confusing definition of "unique" which has caused problems in the past when we could use a clearer and more standard term like "special abilities"? It is not weird, uncommon, or confusing, I was simply unenlightened. Most people do not have that problem, including me now. Wiktionary lists that usage as "proscribed", and according to disctionary.com, Collins English Dictionary describes that usage as "informal", while Random House Dictionary lists it behind 3 other more common and narrower definitions. That seems pretty uncommon and non-standard to me. Actually, Wiktionary is not a legitimate source, that's only two other sites out of thousands. I'm not convinced.

Also, Each Gem has the Unique Ability in their very own variation. Name any Unique Ability, I'll gladly explain how.