Thread:LarsMars/@comment-26457410-20151211222304/@comment-24662946-20151212005931

Poorle wrote: Judgekoo wrote: I'm still trying to wrap my head around the argument of "Her name's been mentioned three times and made a single cameo appearance in a non-episode short even though she has never really appeared in an episode so she must be a major character". You said it yourself, recurring can mean anything, like names but in this instance, it isn't the one the category is using. Ruby and Sapphire have been mentioned more and have actually made an appearance in the show but the two are only considered as minor characters. Just because they've mentioned her a couple of times doesn't mean she's a recurring character, she'd actually need to have multiple repeating appearances throughout the series and actually have a story to tell but as of now, she's still in the shadows. Tsk tsk tsk, you made a straw man judge, misrepresenting my argument isn't going to get you anywhere. The problem is as I said before her plot importance. She was the one who brought Jasper and Peridot to earth in the first place. Their the reason why we have these clusters in the show, which is whats driving the plot forward so far.

As for Ruby and Saphhire I don't really know if they should be consider minor characters or not, but that's not really relevant is it? I never said they couldn't be major characters or minors characters so meh. If i'm completely honest about it, I would classify them as main characters of the show since they fuse into Garnet.

It seems most of you don't want the category on there. That's fine, but most of you are neither right and wrong since the wording of the category is very vague so I guess you have that atleast? Hm, I also found your argument confusing. I'm siding with Judge on this one. We need to at least see more of YD doing stuff before we can even consider her a antagonist character, let alone a major one.