Thread:Superluigi6/@comment-23880286-20150513085740/@comment-23880286-20150516164645

Vogel100 wrote: Everyone's biased for some option. The only difference is I don't go around changing the main message to include the arguments for my option. And that's a big difference. I only want you to think about that. Forget about all the reasons your option is correct, forget about all the reasons I've given for my options.

Just picture this: a discussion about what's better, Apples or Pears. The discussion's been going on for a while and Apples is winning. Then the main message is changed to include this information:

-Pears are bigger than Apples

-Pears have a nicer form than Apples

BUT it is never mentioned that Apples actually taste better than Pears in the main message. So in the end, Pears win. Does that sound fair to you? Because that's exactly what happened here. Just reposting this, because I think you should be able to figure it out for yourself. Those are all facts by the way in this hypothetical situation. It's a fact that pears are bigger than apples, it's a fact they have a nicer form and it's a fact that apples taste better. Think a bit longer this time.

@Luigi So is this considered very slightly? Because I consider it to be quite biased and unfair. Only because one person who supports option one is an admin, that one is now gonna get many more votes than it would otherwise.