Talk:Fusion Cuisine/@comment-25485689-20141001040402

Okay, this may just be me overanalyzing things, but the title gets me thinking; is the fusion gem of Amethyst, Pearl, and Garnet somehow against Gem law? And if so, why? And how does this relate to the three gem's fusion?

Well, I came across a picture looking at past episodes and found the temple depiction of Rose battling what appears to be another gem.

Take a close look at the rival gem. The body is reminiscent of both Garnet's and Pearl's, the "clothes" are similar to Garnet's, and the hair is wild like Amethyst's and is pointed upwards like Pearl's. Also, it seems to be attacking with it's hands, almost as if it's gems (or some of them) are on it's hands. The triangles on its body may represent the Gems on its body, but I'm just speculating here.

Maybe the three gem's fusion is outlawed or more than two gems fusing is a crime because they're ultra powerful?

Of course, most fusions we've seen so far are depicted with multiple sets of arms because of the two gems fused together, and the Crystal Gems' temple depicts (supposedly) the fusion of all four Crystal Gems, each with a pair of arms for each character. So, the rival Gem in the picture may be unlikely to be a fusion gem.

Still, is it possible for a fusion gem to not have multiple arms? I don't know, because we have yet to see a fusion with only one set. It's probably not true that the gem fighting Rose is the fusion of the three, but it's something to think about.