Talk:Rose Quartz/@comment-3225961-20171107020622/@comment-3225961-20171115021713

Sookey5, bias is not a legitimate reason to rebuke Garnet's claim.

Read this for reference: Ad hominem Tu Quoque

What came first, the chicken or the egg? You can't prove that Garnet's bias caused her to fabricate the events of "The Answer", and that her bias isn't the result of factual events. Facts and events exist independently of how people feel about them. Could she have exaggerated some details? Sure, but the defense Zircon confirmed in "The Trial " that Rose Quartz was a recognized threat for "several hundred years" before Pink Diamond was shattered. The events from "The Answer" coincide well with this detail, so there is more to suggest that she was in fact, being truthful in that account.

Their appearance, by the way, is a fabrication of Steven's mind, and at the time he had never seen Blue Diamond in person.

Also, you've taken Garnet's statements out of context. Review the transcript, because it never explicitly stated that Blue Diamond was in charge of Earth. Why she was there specifically can be debated, but she's relevant to Garnet's narrative because she was Sapphire's Diamond, and Sapphire was one of the diplomats sent to Earth to investigate the rebels.