Thread:Superluigi6/@comment-25306382-20150102035556/@comment-25765284-20150102193001

Jay T. Dawgzone wrote: Superluigi6 wrote: Jay T. Dawgzone wrote: Superluigi6 wrote: I don't want to take sides. I believe that here, if someone breaks a rule then that person should be punished. But we need to determine with each of these cases whether it was someone breaking a rule or not.

I took a quick peak at the thread you linked and it seems as if what happened is that you stated that you wanted to be a buero, KnightPearl saw this as a form of begging, and banned you from the chat. In this case, you should not have been banned from the chat. But please confirm with me that that is what happened. I did find a thread about you asking to be a buero.

But here is the confusing part that gives me a headache trying to think about it. I found a thread that you made asking to be a buero. Let's assume that KnightPearl saw this instead as begging. Essentially, Killer said wait until everything is sorted out. Well, there is a thread for KnightPearl applying for admin. So in a way, if your thread was a form of begging, then that means that KnightPearl's thread was begging. So is it begging? I don't know.

In the screenshot (which is very helpful), KnightPearl says "you little punk". I'm going to assume that KnightPearl is calling you a little punk, so please confirm with me about this one as well. Violation of our Rules and Regulations. In this case, KnightPearl should receive a small warning on it.

And in the screenshot, Judgekoo (who has spoken on Killer's thread about this) says "What happened to being mature, Jay?" In this case, you did something that you are not telling me which is the real reason why KnightPearl banned you. In this case, you are either not telling me something important in this case or there was just a simple misunderstanding that I, Judgekoo, or KnightPearl doesn't understand.

You also provided a photo of KnightPearl demoting you. This is just undeniable. I don't know of a rule here that punishes staff who demote others without buero consent, but assuming that Pearl/Killer never knew, I'm willing to estimate that KnightPearl should receive a very strict warning or (might be too strict here) a demotion to chat mod temporarily.

I'm just so emotional now from this Wiki about this case. Some might see it as nothing, but for me it's Lion 3 level. It was a misunderstanding by Judgekoo, I suppose he was trying to convince me to stop fighting with KP. But she kept going on about it, so I tried to stand up for myself. Apparently, that just made it worse and I guess Judgekoo thought that I started this argument in the first place. But if KP would've kept her mouth shut, and not ranted about it on my wall, this never would've happened. So in retrospect, she started it, and a long time ago she said I should be demoted just because I'm twelve (even thought Pearl has given me full permission). And she even complained about me being promoted once (I think its on Pearl's wall or yours)! I will unban you when you offically tell your whole side of the story. No "here's a link to a thread", please tell your side of the story. So far, it seems as if you asked to be a buero, KnightPearl saw that as begging, you offered for truce, and she banned you. I entered the chat, I told KP about the message she sent me, she said don't beg because its the rules, I told her don't post stuff like that on my wall and that I know what the rules are, then she talked about me being underage and how I don't have power and all that and to stop being sassy, I knew I wasn't being sassy and I was just trying to politely tell her to keep her opinion to herself, not rant about and think she's superior because she's an admin, so I decided to stop talking about it, then she gos on and on about it, I had to do something, so one thing led to another and I got sick of talking about it so I decided to make a truce, but she refused, I tried again, so she kicks me out, I decide to get a second chance to make a truce, then I get banned, end of story.

Yep, pretty much