Talk:Rose Quartz/@comment-31698405-20171119175824/@comment-31698405-20171123044542

That last part is true, it can be interpreted that way

But that's the issue, it can be interpreted in the other way too, the conversation doesn't give the viewer a clear message, at least, is not the message i'm getting as a viewer, it's not direct enough

thanks for the correction with "neutral" and "encyclopedic"