Thread:CrystalMomSquad/@comment-5956954-20170705015017/@comment-26512791-20170705021244

Cheeseskates wrote: IMDb may look professional (I hate it. Looks ugly), but I wouldn't say it earns the benefit of a doubt because of that. The Wikipedia would look like a nice business document or essay, and I would call that professional at the University level. IMDb PRO I do get because that requires payment and is for the sake of businesses and people getting into contact with one another, but that wouldn't be replicable for other people :(

I wouldn't consider it a reliable source myself as a result but rather have it as a starting point for further cross-referencing (like Wikipedia) for stuff like her Linkedin profile (which does not exist). You mentioned that it had to be verified with a URL, but if there is no other source other than IMDb, then where would the verifying URL be? It's interesting because people would see the URL more than the IMDb when it is discovered because it is from either the actress themselves or by the company she is in.

I'll contact IMDb to see if they can provide the URL or some additional proof of her age. Otherwise, if they can't, then it will probably be removed soon. Yes, hopefully IMDb provide some clarity on the source of her age. I assumed it'd be more creditable than wikipedia by their more tedious editing system, which I persume goes through moderation before publishing.