Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25539649-20150618004228/@comment-26225030-20150628202919

Look, whose to say the corruption of a gem is a quick change? What if its a continuous metamorphosis. The longer a corrupt gem is corrupt, the more corrupt it gets. Maybe? and just maybe the centipeedle, as the first gem monster aired, has been corrupt for a very very long time. Everyone says that Sardonyx is the centipeedle cuz theres a green sardonyx but the shade of green is way off. The centipeetle, when poofed, is just that pokeball looking "gem", but why does it have gems all over its back? We've only seen fusions with more than one gem, so if the eye is a gem, as well as the stones on its back, perhaps the centipeetle is a fusion. How exactly does that link to the centipeetle eye showing up when the cluster was transported? I have no idea. But there is so much that we don't know...too many unconnected dots. I do think, though, that this is too big of an error. Now every time I rewatch this scene I notice it clearly. It gives me the feeling that they knew what they were doing and did it to mess with us (in a positive way). It's clear that they see what goes on in this wiki's forums, we've done a good job of figuring out things like Garnet being a fusion, or the diamond authority, or Rose potentially being a diamond, but the corrupted gems and the potential fusion theories are completely reliant on speculation. This little animation "error" just through another fire into the mix and man am I excited.