Board Thread:Off-topic/@comment-27847292-20160320014556/@comment-31639134-20160404234927

Aptos wrote:

XxGaiaXx wrote:

Aptos wrote: Self-comparison provides an emotional interpetation to the situation. This could validate a romantic or platonic emotional scenario. However if both could be validation emotionally, then that means evidence can not be used to prove anything. Therefore, self comparison is totally allowed. But if both sides can justify it then it is not proof. Self comparison? No, it really isn't. It really can't be used as evidence. The person isn't Amethyst or Peridot. We don't know Amethyst and Peridot's intentions. Exactly! You understand the underlying concept behind the nature of the evidence as circumstantial, however it is evidence. It merely is only proof if it can only be explained by one side. For the last time ;  Its. Not. Really.Evidence.