Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26342283-20150426230124/@comment-26248252-20150510235143

Owenbretts wrote: Hublijhar wrote:

Owenbretts wrote:

Hublijhar wrote:

Owenbretts wrote: Since Steven has both human and gem DNA its possible that there could be a whole new gem to be created or at least the child would have some gem powers even without a gem. Steven's child would need to have a gem in order to have gem powers, and since there would be no way for Steven to pass his gem to his child, the son/daughter would just be an average human being. It is also very unlikely that the offspring would manifest it's own gem.

The gems are the gem's source of power, energy, and everything the gem is. Theoretically speaking, if a gem lost its gem and continued to live, it wouldn't have all of its gem powers and it would essentially be a boring old fleshy meat-bag, (but in reality if a gem lost it's gem it would die or become corrupt).

PS: Gems don't have DNA. Everything that has a physical form has DNA. Thats how Steven is a gem and no just a human, Rose passed her gem DNA and it fused with Greg's human DNA and it gave Steven the ability to have and use Rose's gem. Also, if you check out one of my theorys (cant be bothered to put the link in), the way a kindergarten works is by injecting Gem DNA into plain old gemstones. Also, just thought of this, Steven and Connie could combine thier passed on DNA with some of Steven's gem DNA and inject it into a gemstone of his/Connie's choosing, and it could grow and could create a semi-perminate form, like Steven's form, and be a 1/2 or 1/4 gem/human hybrid "Everything that has a physical form has DNA." I cringe at how naïve this comment is. Rocks have physical forms, but no DNA. My shoes have a physical form, but no DNA. Your mobile device/computer has a physical form, but no DNA. I could go on and on, more that 75% of the things on Earth have physical forms but no DNA. I think what you meant was, "Every living thing has DNA", but in Pearl's words, "Our bodies are just a projection of our gems". Gems don't have blood, they don't have organic tissue, they have human organs, (but that's because they replicate human anatomy), but they cannot replicate DNA or create/have their own DNA. Steven is half gem because he has Rose's gem, this is what makes up the 50% human 50% gem "DNA", but in reality he has human DNA mixed with the magical properties of Rose's gem. NOT Rose's DNA. And as for your theory, THEORY, we don't know how Kindergarten works because it hasn't been explained in the show or by any members of the CREWNIVERSE. First of all, everthing that lives has a physical form is what I meant to say. Second Gems do have sweat and tears and seliva, which have DNA. Also, even though its just a theory, do you have a better idea who gems, at least Kindergarten gems, are created... thats what I though. Another thing, if Gems dont have DNA then how come Steven looks like both Rose and Greg, if Rose didnt pass any physical things to Steven then he would look much much more like Greg and nothing like Rose at all. Before you ask how he looks like Rose, he has her skin tone, laugh, stary eyes, and placement of Gem. As far as I know, laughs and stary eyes aren't hereditary. the placement of the gem and skin tone (ps: Rose's is pinker) corresponds with the gem's magical properties. And I never said Rose Quartz didn't pass ANYTHING to Steven, just not DNA. And he does look ALOT like young Greg, shown in "Story for Steven", in fact, Greg and Rose looked a lot alike in the first place (they have the same basic head shape, and body build). And I do have a better theory about the Kindergarten, one word: MAGIC. And while sweat, tears, and saliva have DNA in meat-bags, they don't in Gems because there is no DNA to go into it.