Board Thread:Off-topic/@comment-26593284-20150829191623/@comment-27004891-20150830221428

Niop3 wrote: Sproolegendtv wrote: Niop3 wrote: Sproolegendtv wrote:

Niop3 wrote: [Highly doupt the Pod was in perfect shape to had gone to space. It was set off after the ship crashed, Read] (Even if it WAS damaged that doesn't mean it can't fly. Also, the only reason for that is because Conker is a slow replier. Also, don't be disrespectful. The pod is flying, that's Conker's choice if it works and so it flies.) [I am a sociopath. I don't care if I am disrespectfull] (That's not an excuse.)

(I'M BACK!)

Sphene: "Dorado sir, do you want me to take control for you?" ====Sociopathy[ edit] ==== The word element socio has been used in compound words since around 1880. The term sociopathy may have been first introduced in 1909 in Germany by biological psychiatrist Karl Birnbaum and in 1930 in the US by educational psychologist George E. Partridge, as an alternative to the concept of psychopathy. It was used to indicate that the defining feature is violation of social norms, or antisocial behavior, and has often also been associated with postulating social as well as biological causation.

There are various contemporary usages of the term. Robert Hare claimed in the popular science book entitled Snakes in Suits that sociopathy and psychopathy are often used interchangeably, but in some cases the term sociopathy is preferred because it is less likely than is psychopathy to be confused with psychosis, whereas in other cases which term is used may "reflect the user's views on the origins and determinates of the disorder". Hare contended that the term sociopathy is preferred by those that see the causes as due to social factors and early environment, and the term psychopathy preferred by those who believe that there are psychological, biological, and genetic factors involved in addition to environmental factors. Hare also provides his own definitions: he describes psychopathy as not having a sense of empathy or morality, but sociopathy as only differing in sense of right and wrong from the average person.

(I really don't care.)