Talk:Ruby/@comment-3271485-20150313105652/@comment-26199506-20150313120231

@lxbran rebecca sugar did not say first 'actual' male she said (and the screenshot is right there and you can read it) first AND only male gem. dont put words into rebeccas mouth when she did not say that, while you simultaneously also just a while before posted a vague screenshot of someone who we still dont even know who it is made a comment saying ruby was male. also dont say 'actual' male because as long as they identify as a male they ARE male, its the same thing. theres no 'actual' or 'fake' males. stop trying so hard for ruby to be a male gem when theres no concrete evidence for it and a lot against it. not to mention by this logic there are Already more male gems than female, if thats what youre worried about (0 female gems, as theyre all genderless, except for the 1 male gem, whos steven) so im unsure as to why youre so excited for a male gem when there already is one