Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-4224349-20150314152335/@comment-24990623-20150319014550

Starboy217 wrote: I don't like to think of garnet being a fusion. that's a bit much to comprehend. I like to think of Ruby and Sapphire each being HALF of garnet, instead garnet being, well, you know. Think of it like this-Opal is a fusion because she wasn't previously established, doesn't have much background, and splits. Garnet is basically the opposite. So, I'm not saying anyone is wrong. I'm saying that I like it this way better. I prefer to think that they were meant to be together, and not because their fusion was introduced first.