Thread:Superluigi6/@comment-26076464-20150323021923/@comment-26076464-20150327010333

Lilduders wrote: Thorntail02 wrote: Lilduders wrote: Superluigi6 wrote: Thorntail02 wrote: So should we put the gender pronouns on the template? No, we got backlash from it when we did so. The backlash didn't necessarily come from doing it in the first place, it came from doing it incorrectly. Saying "female" pronouns on the Gems' pages offends some people because "female" pronouns implies that she/her/herself can't be used for nonbinary and other gender nonconforming (I hope I used that term correctly) people and are just solely pronouns for people who identify as female. To avoid a backlash, you could instead put she/her/herself in the pronouns section of the template.

You could also leave it blank, but I think it's better to put as much canon info as possible on the pages and it has been canonically stated that gems are genderless but use she/her/herself pronouns.

I just made sure the genders were genderless and that the pronouns wre gone from the templates. I can go put the pronouns back. No, it's fine. We should wait for SL's response on the matter, and thank you for your help in removing the pronouns. Btw, I forgot to tell you that I removed the pronouns found on Sapphire's template.

Thanks for removing that. If we have to add the pronouns back, I can add them back.