Thread:Superluigi6/@comment-24597765-20150805025407/@comment-24597765-20150805191622

I figured that NSFW rule was like it's own subsection of the controversy rule. Like, here's a hypothetical one:

Speaker A: Man, I can't believe how much R34 there is of Connie.

Speaker B: It's the internet, dude.

Speaker C: And it doesn't even come close to the amount of Pearl R34

Speaker B: I saw this one of Pearl and Connie. Can't link it or describe it but man the internet is a weird place.

THIS, would be fine. As nothing specific is used. It's a discussion OF NSFW content. It would, at best, fall under the rule of controversy, which is allowed until a fight starts or a mod says it should stop (and the mod really shouldn't say anything until or just before a fight).

Now, when the NSFW rule would apply is when users go into their sex lives, or start to describe the images. Had THAT happened, I would've started to kick users.

And I get that you have faith in PK but 3 month is overkill. 3 days ban at most for Raho, and that's only if you want to look at his "disrespectful" comments as direct, yet subtly hidden, insults to PK (they weren't and you'd have to dig hard to see them as that, but that's still the worst possible offense). If a user gets steamed and starts insulting or disrespecting staff, the 20 minute-1 day ban is to give them time to cool off so they can come back on in a better mood. Everything after this is just for repeated personal attacks.