Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26248252-20150418023438/@comment-26217701-20150422141139

Hublijhar wrote: ThePhilosophunculist wrote: Hublijhar wrote: I agree that there is a very high chance yellow diamond will be female, and personally i think it will be female, but there is still a small chance it could be male. What i am saying is most people assume its female but epwe don't know what it is. And how is this "some lame attempt to feel more included"? I'm not saying it is male, it just could be male. And there are plenty of male characters in the show to "make me feel better about myself". Yet there's still a need for a "male" gem, huh?

Tell me what adding a "male" gem would bring to the table. It truly is amazing how you people have been twisting and putting words into my mouth. I never once said there NEERS to be a male gem. I said it could be a male and could be a female, and it would bring diversity to the table. If ALL gems are female, the show would eventually get boring. 1. Nobody is putting words in your mouth. You're the one making it seem like there needs to be a "male" gem for whatever reason you have.

2. There's already plenty of diversity on the show. You're skirting around my question though. How would the show get more exciting with a "male" gem? Why would all the gems being "female" make the show boring?