Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26248252-20150418023438/@comment-26248252-20150423121618

ThePhilosophunculist wrote: @Hublijhar Me saying "Yet there's still a need for a "male" gem, huh?" =/= Me saying "Hublijhar said there's a need for a "male gem." There's a difference. Where did anyone call you sexist though? Did anyone actually type "Hublijhar is a sexist and hates women!!!!1111"? No.

@A man of questionable sanity That's what I'm saying.

As cool as the idea of a "male" gem sounds it is literally the most unnecesary thing ever. All the gems could be "female" but they're all going to be completely different (As evident by the different personality types we've seen so far). We've literally seen 7 gems, not counting Steven since he's a hybrid, that were completely different. Making a gem "male" wouldn't add diversity to the story because guess what?! It's already incredibly diverse. Yes, Strong In The Real Way called me sexist in the comments of the page. But for the final time, my point was not to say, "we need a male gem", it was to get people to stop listing yellow diamond as female because we don't know want it is, you can see that clearly if you look at the main discussion point. I truly am sorry if you believe I think there needs to be a male gem, that was not the point of this thread.