Thread:Peridot The Techtition/@comment-24583427-20150407224830/@comment-26061913-20150409014632

Lilduders wrote: Superluigi6 wrote: Lilduders wrote: Superluigi6 wrote: Lilduders wrote: Not to sound too rude, but we actually were fine with the amount of users we had in the positions before, there weren't too many. The only reason there was more CMs was because our chat was growing and we only had one active chat mod at the time, so we decided to add around 4-6 so we'd always have at least one CM on the chat at all times. Killer stated that he wanted maybe 3-4 chat mods instead. I explained to him that the chat was getting really active but at the end of the day some changes had to happen to make it 3-4 instead of 4-6. Well, my point of there being an extra amount of CM due to wanting more CM in the chat is still valid. I'd also like to add on and say that I don't think Bill should be a patroller because of aforementioned requirement issues, but I could accept him as a CM if we absolutely had to give him a position at all since I see him in the chat from time to time but I don't see him editing articles (he's only ever edited on templates), and patrollers are a position specifically for dealing with articles.

Your arguments is still indeed valid, however Killer explained that we need to have 3-4. I tried to convince him to go 4-6 (which I still believe in) but we discussed on users with multiple positions and such.

I hate to repeat myself (which I'm known to do a lot), but the best real explanation I can provide is to trust the bureaucrats and that if you'd like more info ask Peridot. Also, Peridot demoted AwesomeSteven to a CM. I think it's because he demoted Bill from patroller, but demoting AS as a retaliation isn't a good way to handle things.

I was thinking the same thing... I'm pretty sure he was only trying to help, but got pure-backlash as a result. He's doing what he thinks is best (i.e. complying to the requirements), so why retaliate against it? I think of his demotion as an abuse of power, honestly.