Thread:50000cal/@comment-5953403-20161103005959/@comment-30401234-20161103014024

Hey everyone, I just want to start off by saying I accept my one day ban without any resentment though honestly I disagree with it. I didn't come here to debate that however, I just wanted to point out that literally nothing Katie linked should be considered by any sane and rational indiviual as evidence of harassment. It's taken completley out of context, for one, but even on it's own I don't see how it is maliscious in intent towards her. For those of you that are interested in the truth, as soon as I logged into the chatroom Katie accused me of being a troll simply based on my name. She countinued this narative for a while and all I did was ask her what evidence she had to make such claims at which point she attacked Turbo for 'attacking' her as well. I was just making the case to one of the moderators, 'sophiedp', that I've seen trolls behave in such an inflamitory way before, trying to attack people under the guise of following the rules. This, to me, seems to be very clearly what she's doing and I can link a message she sent me personally which can attest to this. I made little to no interaction with this person, both me and turbo were simply telling sophie we think katie is being immature and trolling, which I still think she is. I would also like to point out that in one of her screenshots katie is directly attacking the moderator; does she think that she (the moderator) is harassing her as well? (http://prnt.sc/d2e1vr).

Another screenshot I don't understand is this (http://prnt.sc/d2e18r). Turbo is simply stating Katie lacks maliscious intent, which to me would seem like a good thing. Clearly Katie doesn't understand what is being said or simply doesn't care and wishes to warp reality to fit her naritive and get us in trouble; either way, I don't think this kind of behaviour is acceptable and I would personally suggest her case is further looked into. that's about all. peace out