Board Thread:Off-topic/@comment-27357780-20151213172712/@comment-4165786-20151214021347

Aptos wrote: Gray Pea Shooter wrote: Aptos wrote: Gray Pea Shooter wrote: You didn't provide evidence until after the fact. It still counts as a claim. I just said you had no proof. Which you didn't at your first post. And the proof you provided seems incredible flimsy and there's no actual proof. To be clear, evidence comes after a claim, and before a warrant. How does it count as a claim, it is a stance of advocacy against a claim. I have previously stated my evidence. My first post had evidence. And how is my evidence flimsy? Furthermore, I do not even truly need evidence, YOU have the burden of proof. Hold on a second.

Were you saying the gems inside the bird were the birds gems or that they were Stevens.

Either way I still don't see how that proves its their gem. Sure it's in the bird stomach, but but that doesn't automatically make it the monsters gem. I was saying the birds gems were a collection of shards fused to make the form, and that inside the form are the stomach bubbles. The stomach bubbles probably would absorb the gems into the shards once the form was poofed

Welp.

I made a mistake.

That's what I get for saying something goofy in a thread. It becomes a bitter arguement and I embarrass myself. Oh well. I concede defeat. You seem to be correct. I'll be going now.