Talk:Caste System/@comment-34997073-20190826180103

i was changing the parts that felt weird or irrelevant.

calling the types of gems in a group "subtype" was weird for gemstones, variety worked but type is just as good.

referring to nephrites as a type of jade is pointless as we only similarity they have is same VA. we dont refer to rubies and sapphires as a type of corundum or emeralds as a type of beryl.

i felt that including information on a defective sapphires future vision was just irrelevant when describing the gem type itself and not listing a specific character like the pages dedicated to those types of gems.