Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26285761-20150702074516/@comment-26285761-20150705094541

Gordon Ecker wrote: The Most Interesting Nobody in the World wrote: Okay, but the point was that your preferred definition of "unique" could fit the aforementioned "Unique Abilities" as much as mine. My point is that, if we use one of the looser, more informal definitions of "unique", well-meaning wiki editors who are used to a narrower, more formal definitions of the term are likely to interpret that usage as a mistake, and might try to fix the apparent mistake by removing or reorganizing the entries.

My point is that there are many perfectly good alternatives, alternatives which are less likely to result in edit conflicts over what should or shouldn't be listed, and that many of these alternatives (such as "special abilities" or "powers and abilities") are commonly used on other wikis without any problems.

Why do you think that "unique abilities" is the best term to use? I don't have much an opinion on what is the "best," I just don't have that much of a problem with the way things are currently.