Board Thread:Off-topic/@comment-27847292-20160320014556/@comment-27847292-20160419001834

PeridotThePerky wrote: I-Ship-Stevidot wrote: PeridotThePerky wrote: I-Ship-Stevidot wrote: Perlen297 wrote: They may or may not have romantic feelings for each other. But that doesnt mean they will never have. They are actually have a good romantic compability, dynamic, character and personality wise. Those ship teases might mean something significant afterall... That doesn't mean they WILL lead to something. There are a lot of ship teases for every ship, including the 'bad' ones. Still, none of these ship teases for anything besides Stevonnie have been as DIRECT as Peridot landing on top of Amethyst. If anything, that isn't exactly a subtle hint. Peridot landed on top of Amethyst. So what? Trope or not, IMPACT or not, its still not evidence. Landing on top of someone =/= evidence for romance. Considering Peri goes through MANY tropes, she can really be paired with anyone. Again, a tease, no matter the impact, is still just a tease. Okay... But then what's the POINT of that whole scene. Every Amedot hater says the same thing: "You can't ship two people just because one landed on top of the other!" Maybe you guys are right. Maybe we shouldn't ship it. But regardless of if we "should" ship it or not, I have yet to find someone explaining why the Crewniverse didn't just have Peridot land next to Amethyst. The same order of events would have happened, but someone decided to have them land next to each other.

Why? Is it meaningless to you? When Pearl knocked into Garnet, it wasn't for similar reasons. Pearl was trying to capture Peridot. The dancing? Yes, I can agree that's a bit shippy, but the show has clarified that Garnet doesn't want to be in a relationship AND they just did it to show Steven how fusion worked.

And, @AquaticPanic, you have not interpreted what I have said correctly. In fact, I don't think you've read that many of my posts because of what you just said. If Peridot had been shown to be fairly nice a bit earlier on and then risked her physical form to save Amethyst WITHOUT what happened afterwards, then no biggie. But Peridot landed on top of Amethyst for seemingly no reason, and Peridot had never been shown before to be that kind to someone.

Also, it's more than just "Too Far". If you've been reading my posts, you would see that there's a lot more evidence than just that. If you need any MORE, I'd be happy to provide.

I know that the wiki is bursting with anti-shippers, but I feel like you guys aren't really completely listening to what I'm saying, saying that "the same thing basically happened here" when it really didn't, or just saying that a simple ship tease was nothing. Read my evidence! It's not like it's that hard! Quoting myself: 'Rule 65: EVERYTHING IS SHIPPABLE'.

I am not saying to stop shipping Amedot. That would be hypocritical on my end.

However, the same can go for you. Look at how I compare trope with trope. You tear it down each time. That isn't complaining, that is REFUTING. We compare two VERY SIMILAR SCENES that you use as evidence.

Same with Centipeetle. Centipeetle had been shown as a cruel beast up to that point. Worse than Peri, who was just a dork. Yet you seem to avoid that fact. The difference between Centi's behavior THEN and her behavior BEFORE is drastic. She never risked her life for someone while corrupted. And as far as we know, neither had any other corrupted gem.

I think the scene was there for shippers, mostly. There are a lot of shippy scenes, such as that one. At that point, I'm sure people were shipping Amedot, so they gave something for the Amedots to feast on as evidence. If, say, Peridot were to do that to Steven, it wouldn't be that dramatic. Like the Endgame thing, not ALL Ship teases will lead to something (by endgame thing, there was that game for Pearlmethyst, Stevidot and literally Stevonnie XD)

We are reading your evidence, or at least I am! But your evidence seems to be the same thing, ship teases and falling!