Thread:GarThorTmk/@comment-24986099-20190213045646/@comment-24986099-20190221201942

Alright let's get into the tea then, shall we?

GarThorTmk wrote: You want me to double check the date on every comment I feel like I want to reply to?

Yes! Very simple! takes less than 2 seconds.

GarThorTmk wrote: Furthermore, I'm not sure that you fully understand that I was attempting to contribute, and before I finished my contributions, you deleted the page I was creating.

The page you created was not needed. It's a normal part of editing to have your edits revised or undone for the betterment of the wiki.

GarThorTmk wrote: The series is nearly 6 years old now, some necro-posting is bound to happen.

Yes, which is why you received a simple warning to advise you not to do it again.

GarThorTmk wrote: If you are dicks about it, its toxic to your community, and nobody will want to spend time here.

Cheesekates wrote: It's part of the rules not to necropost. Feel free to contribute to the wiki, however. There are just things that people have to follow before they do so first.

'''Thanks for understanding. Have a good time!'''

If this is what you consider "being a dick," you have a very warped sense of human interactions?

GarThorTmk wrote: Ok. So now I think we need to get into the nitty gritty, 'cause I'm still not sure what exactly I did wrong, and both of you guys seem like you are over-policing.

Very confused by this, seeing as the only comment that I made prior to this was the one where I simply reminded you of the rules?

GarThorTmk wrote: As of this moment, I don't actually see where "necroposting" is called out in the rules.



GarThorTmk wrote: Implying I am a clown is insulting

Cheeseskates isn't implying you're a clown, they're giving an example.

GarThorTmk wrote: calling me honey when you don't know me is insulting

It's a platonic term of endearment used most commonly in the context of "talking to someone that one respects," if you took it as an insult it's on you, but it's not intended as such.

GarThorTmk wrote: you all really need to re-evaluate your policies on tearing down contributions and contributors without thinking or explaining your reasoning if you want your website to live.

The wikia is a big site with well over 50 edits happening daily. The staff here are volunteers and not everyone has the free time to explain the intricate details of why or why not an edit stays or is reverted.

In fact, I did give a reason to why the edit was undone.

GarThorTmk wrote: Instead of making this an argument about weather or not an X-12 page should live, you've twisted it into an argument about why I shouldn't be here

Cheeseskates wrote: Thanks for understanding. Have a good time! Cheeseskates wrote: Sorry if this upsets. I hope you continue to contribute,

Not sure why you decided to play the victim card, but here we are, I guess. Not only did Cheeseskates not tell you to leave the wiki, they did the opposite, apologizing (for no reason, honestly,) and wishing you to continue using the wikia.

All of that said, you reeaally blew a simple warning thread out of proportion for seemingly no reason at all!

Hope to see you continue to contribute to the wiki and please have a wonderful day!