Board Thread:Off-topic/@comment-27847292-20160320014556/@comment-27276409-20160327015616

I-Ship-Stevidot wrote: PeridotThePerky wrote: I-Ship-Stevidot wrote: PeridotThePerky wrote: Aptos wrote: 1. technically we dont know how old peridot is. And a lot of those are quirks as a result of different personality traits. Peridot is insecure and possesive because she is just a peridot and feels she should have hose rights, amethyst is insecure and possesive because she wasn't the ideal amethyst. Furhtermore, almost everyone gets emotionally charged when something is important. And them still learning, peridot just arrived, amethyst has bden there for millenia. She knows about earth.

2. And if no one knows, then noone can really say it helps them over an opponent

1. Still, I think their similarities and differences make a them a pretty good relationships, whether it be romantic or platonic. (But since this is a thread about romantic feelings, ROMANTIC!)

2. Agreed. If non of us really know how Amethyst uses her nicknames, we cannot use it as evidence. HARD FACTS HERE, PEOPLE! 1. That is bias. Using 'I think it is gonna be canon' as evidence is bias, as it is based on opinion.

2. Really? Amedot is more canon than Stevonnie? Excuse me while I laugh.

10 hrs of laughing later...

Anyways, Amedot is one of the ships with least evidence, especially on Amy's side. Amethyst treats her like Steven.

OH SO NOW THAT PERIDOTTHEPERKY SAYS IT EVERYONE STOPS XD

Uh... when did I say that Amedot has more evidence than Stevonnie? Or ANY of those things you just claimed I had said? Either you quoted the wrong post (which I highly douby since you used my name) or you are taking all my posts in the wrong way. I said nothing about Stevonnie OR how I think that it's gonna become canon. I try not to use bias in my posts, but we all have (including you, I-Ship-Stevidot) and on a thread like this bias is a bit hard to avoid.

Anyways, I think Amedot has a WHOLE lot more evidence than most ships this fandom has come up with. More than Lapidot, more than Pearlmethyst, more that Pearlnet, and definitely more than Stevidot. I do think Stevonnie has more evidence than Amedot, but that does not say that Amedot doesn't have much basis in canon. It actually has quite a lot.

And yes, I do hope that people stop bringing up the nickname thing because something like that is never going to be resolved. Although, I guess this whole thread will never be resolved until Amedot or a ship that disproves it becomes canon. XD

Anyways, PLEASE do not twist my posts into something completely different than what I had said. It's rude and backtracks the evidence that I've given. Stop. Not you, I was talking to Aptos. It kinda sounded like he was saying Stevonnie  had less evidence than Amedot. When I used your name, I was talking about the nickname thing

Sorry...I'll remove the post right now.

It's okay, just be sure to be clear on who you're talking to. But since you quoted my comment, I jsut assumed that it was me that you were talking to.