Thread:Superluigi6/@comment-24597765-20150805025407/@comment-25166946-20150806005227

Sticks the Badger wrote:

Killer365 wrote: May I ask how it's fair to call PK immature when you're the one writing mile long replies about an issue which could've just as easily, if not more so, been sorted out on chat in PM? While PK may have given them a longer ban time then needed I still believe that any Rule34 related things should not be justified. Once a higher ranking user then yourself asks you to stop doing something you should stop doing it.

Also I've been informed that after PK blocked Raho you undid the ban that was completely justifiable. I don't know what feud you and a few other users have with PK but either way you have to realize that he's a good admin and was just doing his job. Also, and please do not have a fit over me saying this, but it seems as though you're only making it a big deal because PK banned your friend because I doubt if this was some random user that you'd be making as big a deal out of it as you are now.

I'd like to also state that as of now the staff are discussing the possibility of you being demoted due to this behavior. So please lets just all be mature about this so nothing rash will take place and this can be sorted out. If they continued to discuss R34 then that would a realistic block (1-2 weeks). But my glob... 6 weeks?

Honestly, this was a poorly thought out block. Raho's "hate thread" was merely a suggestion for the staff to look into PK's actions and determine whether he needs to improve.

I cri. I mean, I sort of agree. I feel like 9 weeks, which has been changed to 6 weeks, was overkill. I mean Raho is sometimes an irate user, and a month and half ban is still very long, in my opinion. I think this is the problem with the rule system; The staff member that does the banning usually decides how long the ban is...