Thread:Tansyflower/@comment-24662946-20150306025248/@comment-4536113-20150307225728

There's really no need to be discussing this. Friedfear was warned many times to stop arguing on three different occasions and I gave him plenty of warning that he'd likely be banned if he continued arguing. I don't know how much more clear I can make that without physically screenshotting all the warnings he received. So, since he continued arguing, he was indeed banned. Unbanning him now wouldn't be very good staffmanship (totally a word now), as it's basically going back on our own word and warnings to him and making it seem like constant arguing is taken lightly, when it's a disruptance to the wiki. If he didn't want to be banned, he should have stopped arguing when asked and no amount of apologies will change that. He's going to come back to the wiki, just not now, so I hope that arguing about it will stop as Friedfear made his decision, regardless of his regrets now. Was three months harsh? Maybe, maybe not. I've seen harsher bans done to users and was on the receiving end of an unlimited ban for having a second account on a forum site when I was 10 years old. 5 years later and I've certainly learned my lesson, but I chose to break a rule by making a second account so that's entirely on me. (A bit off topic, but I just want to show how reasonable 3 months is compared to what Friedfear could have received.)