</p><p>Anyways, I think that the rareness and cut of a gemstone is what determines some of the fusion sizes. </p><p>According to this website I read, Alexandrite is rarer than Diamond. </p> <figure class="article-thumb tright show-info-icon" style="width: 180px">
<figcaption> <p class="caption">size comparison</p> </figcaption></figure>with my theory, it kinda make sense seeing this comparison chart here.
<p></p><p>For the rareness part: This theory also leads into what a possible name is for the temple gem. According to the google, the rarest gemstone in the world is Painite. Seeing as the temple gem is obvously larger than Alexandrite, which is pretty much the tallest fusion we've see so far (Aside from when Malachite is on hind legs. or arms?), it make sense for it to be a rarer gemstone. </p><p>
</p><p>Ok, for the last part of this theory I think gem cut has something to do with it too. ok, so I saw this rambling theory on why Amethyst is "devective" on tumblr, and it makes a lot of sense. </p><p>So you know Bismuth calls Amethyst "Deep Cut" refering to the cut of her gem. Deep cut gems tend to look smaller in size while shallow gems look larger. </p><p>Amethyst and Jasper are both quartz, and we know amethysts can be the size of Jasper because of the gaurds at the human zoo. </p> <p style="font-weight:normal;">Another reason this makes sense is because, Garnet is a two gem fusion as is Malachite. However, malechite is WAY larger in size than garnet is. I think that malachite might be a rarer gemstone type. If not, that's where the second half comes in. Since Ruby and Sapphire both are smaller gems, and Jasper is a Bigger gem and lapis is kinda inbetween,I think that might have something to do with Garnet being smaller than Malachite.</p> <p style="font-weight:normal;"></p> <p style="font-weight:normal;"></p> <p style="font-weight:normal;">Anyways, what do you think???</p>
