lol no

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Preproman wrote: I don't want the serie to stretch further than it should. There is a story, there is a plot line, the creators already know where it will develop and end, and how. </p><p>But also I don't want the show to end with season five, because I really can't see how they will come to the conclusion of every open plot thread in just 36 episodes. </p><p>For example, I never fully enjoyed how Gravity Falls ended. It seemed to me it was a little rushed. I felt like season 2 could have been easily stretched into 2 separated seasons, thickening some plot holes and without adding many fillers. I kinda feel like that was the original intention of the creators, with a full season 2 ending with Stan's arrival and a full season 3 with more details revealed about Bill and the Weirdmageddon. </p><p>My hope is that this will not happen to Steven Universe. There are so many details we still don't know, characters that need to be introduced, places we need to see, that it can't be rushed to its end leaving some open questions. I guess it could easily reach season 7 without losing its sparks and best bits. But who knows, we'll see what it will be. </p> </i></div>
<p>I wouldn't exactly see it continue for a seven season as it would be far impossible, I'm pretty sure that  we'll get some detail for some answers would be see soon. but for now, i wouldn't exacity be worrying about a show ending due to the fact that it'll might ruin the chances of ignoring about the series end. </p>

<p>The biggest problem with this logic is the creators aren't planning to end the story at season 5. Rebecca Sugar herself said they were "writing themselves into a serious corner" with that season, which means there would be more after it. If it ends at season five then it was cut short before the full story could be told, bottom line. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Ed486 wrote: The biggest problem with this logic is the creators aren't planning to end the story at season 5. Rebecca Sugar herself said they were "writing themselves into a serious corner" with that season, which means there would be more after it. If it ends at season five then it was cut short before the full story could be told, bottom line. </p> </i></div>
<p>Well that's good! But it's Cartoon Network decides if they want to renew Steven Universe with more season. If not, Well Rebecca Sugar will have to change the storyline. </p><p>Anyway, If they does renew the show. I would like if they do on Snake People since it was Ronaldo theory and he always got right with his theory! So he could be right with Snake People theory! </p>

They likely already produced through to season five so if cartoon network does what you're suggesting in this thread we'll be left with an incomplete story. Your assertion that the show "should" end at season five is therefore objectively false.

<p>"Writing themselves into a corner". As in, at season 5, they literally can't take the story anywhere else, as that's where it concludes. </p><p>Season 5 is where it ends. Thank god. </p>

That's not what that expression means lol

<div class="quote"><i>Ed486 wrote:
That's not what that expression means lol</i></div>
<p>On the contrary, that is exactly what that expresion means. A better known version of the expression is "Painting yourself into a corner". You have blocked all possible exits for yourself, the only thing you can do is wait for it to dry, i.e. end the show. </p>

<p>lol corners are meant to be written out of. Plus, they've said repeatedly that they aren't planning to end the show at season 5, providing the context for the corner comment that, as always, proves me right. Ending at season 5 = incomplete story. </p>

But something tells me that CN will not renew Steven universe for Season 6....