SB6 SPOILERS: Giving the two _____es their own combined page ("_____ (unfused)") separate from their fusion's page ("_____").

TITLE: Giving the two Topazes their own combined page ("Topaz (unfused)") separate from their fusion's page ("Topaz"). --- Topaz (the fusion) is an important enough character for her unfused components to have some sort of page (presumably a combined page for the two unfused Topazes). There are three ways to go about this. (I kinda like Option A and maybe even B, I guess. They probably shouldn't really be considered too "minor," since they've both appeared multiple times. The two, when fused, form a character who's pretty darn major. On a smaller scale, it's kinda like Ruby and Sapphire. Keeping them on Topaz (the fusion)'s page will almost definitely lead to some problems with linking and formatting, which would honestly decrease the quality of the Wiki, slightly. There are a few courses of action we can take: --- 1. Option A (Support): Giving both Topazes 1 and 2 a combined page. IMO, this is my favorite idea at this point! For now, I think this might be the best course of action. 2. Option B (Support): Giving Topaz 1 her own page and giving Topaz 2 her own page (like "Topaz (left)" and "Topaz (right)"). IMO, it would be crazy to do so, but I'd honestly be down. 3. Option C (Oppose): Putting both Topazes 1 and 2 on the Minor Gem Characters page. IMO, I personally disagree, as they form to make a major character. It's somewhat like shoving Ruby and Sapphire away onto a list of "minor characters." 4. Option D (Oppose): Keeping things the weird way they are by having Topazes 1 and 2 only briefly mentioned on Topaz (the fusion)'s page. IMO, this isn't the best option the way things are. That's squishing three characters into a page meant for one. Honestly, two Topazes should be the maximum for any of these pages. Would Ruby and Sapphire just be weird components and addendums to Garnet's page if she first appeared today? --- What do you all think? I'm honestly torn between Options A and B. I'd love B, but most people might not. --- REAL VOTE:

Support: 11.5 supporters of Options A or B! (giving them some sort of page!)

Oppose: 10.5 supporters (plus Lenhi) of Options C or D! (keeping them squished on MC/G or Topaz!) --- SUB-OPTION VOTE: (EDIT: Since both Pingasopera and I supported both A and B, I just split both half-votes into both, giving two half-votes to A and two half-votes to B, effectively giving one vote to each. We gud?) (EDIT 2: If I'm reading that correctly, split Lapepe Lazumeme's vote between A and D, since they're in support of both.) (EDIT 3: Split DAVID.EXE's vote between C and D, since they're in support of both.) (EDIT 4: Split Bm Vivi's vote between A and B, since they're in support of both. Oh boy, what should we do with these close votes?)

Support Option A: 8

Support Option B: 4.5

Support Option C: 4.5

Support Option D: 6 + Lenhi