2,519
pages
ALL POSTSWould Rhodonite Fusing With Padparadscha create a Sardonyx?
<p>Rhodonite is the fusion of a Pearl and a Ruby, and Padparadscha is a Sapphire. So would they create a Sardonyx if they fused?
</p>
(Edited by Pattoo12345)
Amethyst isn't a fusion
(Edited by LapisLazuliisthebest)
<div class="quote"><i>CrystallineFeline wrote:
I think Sardonyx breaks the fouth wall because Garnet can only see the future when her third eye is closed/covered, and Pearls gem is where their eye should be and is so permanently closed -and she sees the reality of them not being real because the gem is her third eye</i></div>
<p>Maybe she breaks the 4th wall just because that's how she is </p>
I think Sardonyx breaks the fouth wall because Garnet can only see the future when her third eye is closed/covered, and Pearls gem is where their eye should be and is so permanently closed -and she sees the reality of them not being real because the gem is her third eye</i></div>
<p>Maybe she breaks the 4th wall just because that's how she is </p>
(Edited by Solstice the Icewing)
(Edited by Solstice the Icewing)
1
<div class="quote"><i>LapisLazuliisthebest wrote:
Amethyst isn't a fusion</i></div>
<p>i used her for an example. </p>
Amethyst isn't a fusion</i></div>
<p>i used her for an example. </p>
(Edited by Jrkplays)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Jrkplays wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">LapisLazuliisthebest wrote:
Amethyst isn't a fusion</i></div>
<p>i used her for an example. </p> </div> <p>But it's still different to a fusion getting her name. </p><p>Amethyst was programed to know what she needs to such as her name. Mixed Fusions aren't supposed to exist as far as Homeworld's conserved, so there's no reason for them to have names. </p>
Amethyst isn't a fusion</i></div>
<p>i used her for an example. </p> </div> <p>But it's still different to a fusion getting her name. </p><p>Amethyst was programed to know what she needs to such as her name. Mixed Fusions aren't supposed to exist as far as Homeworld's conserved, so there's no reason for them to have names. </p>
(Edited by LapisLazuliisthebest)
<p>Good point!
</p><p>As far as we know, all the fusions named themselves; Garnet and Rainbow Quartz didn't have names when they first fused, instead being referred to a 'fusion', if referred to at all.
</p>
(Edited by Solstice the Icewing)
1
<p>where have you seen that gems name themselves?
</p><p>Smoky had a name. she didn't named herself, she remembered it.
</p><p>And a Malachite fusion wouldn't name herself Ruby. That's the gemstone they have.
</p>
(Edited by Jrkplays)
<div class="quote"><i>Jrkplays wrote:
where have you seen that gems name themselves? <p>Smoky had a name. she didn't named herself, she remembered it. </p><p>And a Malachite fusion wouldn't name herself Ruby. That's the gemstone they have. </p> </i></div>
<p>According to the 18th podcast, Garnet NAMED HERSELF, after the gem she resembled. And smokey didn't name herself smokey because she remembered it (as a smokey quartz fusion doesn't exist), she just came to the conclusion that an amethyst and a rose quartz makes up a smokey quartz. </p>
where have you seen that gems name themselves? <p>Smoky had a name. she didn't named herself, she remembered it. </p><p>And a Malachite fusion wouldn't name herself Ruby. That's the gemstone they have. </p> </i></div>
<p>According to the 18th podcast, Garnet NAMED HERSELF, after the gem she resembled. And smokey didn't name herself smokey because she remembered it (as a smokey quartz fusion doesn't exist), she just came to the conclusion that an amethyst and a rose quartz makes up a smokey quartz. </p>
(Edited by Anonymius)
1
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>According to the 18th podcast, Garnet NAMED HERSELF, after the gem she resembled.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>She did? </p>
<p>She did? </p>
(Edited by Jrkplays)
<p>Yes, she did. If you don't believe me, I'd suggest you listen to the 18th podcast (around 14:26 in).
</p>
(Edited by Anonymius)