BlackZircon wrote:
Toyloli wrote:
BlackZircon wrote:
Toyloli wrote:
Colourblind99 wrote:
Impossible gems are sexless (not a boy or girl)!
exactly, so they're all the same.
But still, they lack a specific gender and or sex. Therefore it is impossible for them to be homosexual because since they're all sexless there is no separate gender for them to choose from. The definition of Homosexuality is: to have erotic activity of another of the same sex or to be sexually attracted to someone of the same sex. If you're Genderless or Sexless the definition is in the name, it basically means you lack a sex/gender which means your sex/gender is nonexistent. In short it is impossible for sexless beings to be homosexual because they lack a sex to begin with.
So you just said. They are all the same sex and gender (which is none) so they can't have same sex relationships...
Having no gender isn't a gender, as I said the concept of being sexless means that ones gender is nonexistent, THEY HAVE NO GENDER PERIOD, also meaning they can't have an orientation. The idea of Gem relationships is pretty incomprehensible and isn't really one of any sexual relation at all, its more of an anomaly that seems to focus more on the idea of being bonded forever without sex/gender playing apart. This doesn't mean they don't have any feelings towards each other, but the feelings are strictly because of the Gems personality and or how they act and have nothing to do with the sex of their companion, because like I said...THEY HAVE NO GENDER(sorry about the caps, just making sure you get the idea XP).
Zero is a number. And consider... Agender.
Personally I think gems are incomparable to humans in almost every way.
But, bipedalism is convenient and useful. So, their forms look similar to ours.
Because gems' forms are similar to humans, it's human nature to project our ways onto species who look similar enough to us. No matter what you think, no matter how you rationalize it, there is always a counter argument. #pearl-is-a-gay-bird