For example, If Crewniverse decides to killed off Lion because pet don't live longer like us, would you get angry for killing off Lion or someone?
Maybe Crewinverse to show fanbase that people or animals or even gems can die
Rose is so far the only "deceased" character on Steven Universe, I got idea! Since Greg or Connie are NOT immortal, have them die of old age! This is not a joke
LarsMars wrote:
Ed486 wrote: They're pretty much all expendable so I don't really have an answer.
Way to thumbs up your own comment there, champ.
Thank you!
The reason poofing and corruption exists is so that they can have the drama of death or near-death without having to kill off any of the main characters. No way any of the main cast dies. That includes Peridot, Lapis, and Lion too. It's just not that kind of show.
That would be hard seeing as you's have to kill Pearl and Garnet first.
I really don't want to see Peridot and Lapis get "killed off". The more they appear, the more I become emotionally attached and the more open they become.
People I definitely want alive:
-Peridot, the precious green Dorito
-Lapis, because she's suffered enough already
-Steven, because he's the sweetest protagonist anyone could hope for
-Connie, because she is basically cartoon me in her personality
-Greg, because he's a cool dad
-Lars, because I'm sure he'll have a change of heart
-Everyone else who's not a villain, because I hate it when my favorite characters die.
But, to be honest, I'm sure by the end of this series, a few awesome characters will have been killed off, but in the end it will have worth it. Just think about the ending to Harry Potter.
It appears we have once again crossed paths, Finny.
Not to mention having to kill Ruby and Sapphire as well
I think that if this question is posed as characters that might die at the end of the series to sacrifice themselves in some way then I would be less opposed, as I generally appreciate the sense that some sacrifice is necessary in the fight against evil. I really, really don't want any of the characters to die before the very end of thet series, especially main characters. BUT, I think of the main characters the one that would make the most sense as the one to sacrifice herself would be Garnet. She is the strongest so she would be the most likely to take on a major villain that is too much for her. Also, she would see it coming because of her Future Vision which would give it a bittersweet note, as she never backed down from her desitiny. I think Peridot is too young to die (really) and has a lot more to experience as an Earth Dorito, Pearl has more growth to do post-story as I don't think she'll work through all of her issues until we get towards the end and I think she deserves to find more peace of mind. Same with Amethyst. She's got some growth to do and she's relatively young as Gems go. Both Pearl and Amethyst are character-flaw-wise rougher around the edges than the ever-grounded Garnet, which why Garnet would be the most likely candidate for sacrificial hero in the end. Lapis has been through enough hardship. The Crewniverse would not be so cruel as to have her die in the end. No way. Also, there is simply no way that Steven or Connie die and the Crewniverse will NOT kill off Steven's only suriving parent. The only one who MIGHT fit the role of the heroic sacrifice if Rebecca Sugar decides to go that way is Garnet in the final battle, in my opinion. I would be heartbroken obviously, but I think it would make more character/storyline sense than any other characters.
everyone alive
but not yellow diamond
(it will be like gravity falls lol)
