No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | @Cyberdefe3nder Not really. Nothing against non-binary, but when they make a character that is defined by just that, then it means they are there just to |
+ | @Cyberdefe3nder Not really. Nothing against non-binary, but when they make a character that is defined by just that, then it means they are there just to please a specific audience and do not have any actual purpose. |
Revision as of 21:08, 30 December 2019
@Cyberdefe3nder Not really. Nothing against non-binary, but when they make a character that is defined by just that, then it means they are there just to please a specific audience and do not have any actual purpose.