FANDOM




  • New Chat Rules

    First off, if you link to inappropriate content (no explanation needed) in the chatroom or on the Wiki then you will be given an instant ban. Steven Universe is a kids show, and they shouldn't be seeing that kind of stuff. There will be no "extreme warnings" or kicks, an instant ban will be placed. Period (almost typed Peridot instead).

    Second, linking to episode links will not give you a ban or a kick from the chatroom. In fact, from now fourth, linking to illegal episode links will never give you a ban. The worse that will happen, is someone editing a post that links to an illegal source out of the post.

    Finally, if you spam (such as copying and pasting text multiple times, USING ALL CAP LETTERS, long posts that require a scroll bar) then you will be kicked. If you come back and do it again, then you will be banned.

    tldr: Linking to inappropriate content gives you an instant ban, linking to illegal episode links will not.


    New Chat Mods

    Currently, our chat mods include Sticks the Badger and Fudgecreep. They are always active and always on the lookout on the chatroom. But this wiki is way too popular to have only 2 chat mods! This wiki should instead have about 6-7 chat mods, guarenteeing that the chatroom will be moderated.

    So, this is what I'll do. People can put down usernames for qualified people that they want to be chat mods, and then next week I'll make another highlighted thread with a bulleted list of those usernames, and users can vote for 5 of those users.

    tldr: Users can put qualified usernames in the comments below for people they want to be chat mod, next week another thread will be made for another vote of those users.

    So vote for as many people as you'd like!!

      Loading editor
    • I honestly think Lilduders would make a great CM, but he/she(Idon'tknowduder'sgenderqwq) might not want it,,

        Loading editor
    • We only need either three or four Chat Moderators. Also, what about links that contain explicit content in it's name (like this)? I think the best option is to post it in a private message, and not the main chat.

        Loading editor
    • Sticks the Badger wrote:
      I think we only need either 3-4 Chat Moderators. Also, what about links that have explicit contect in it's name? I.E. gem****.tumblr.com

      Our chatroom has so many people in it nowadays, and for a Wiki this large for a show this large we can't just have 3-4 chat moderators.

      And I guess links that have explicit content in it's name are alright, since it's not advertising to anything innapropriate.

        Loading editor
    • Please be sure that those users have 500+ edits or have been on here for 3 months. And people can only vote if they hae either 150 edits or have been on here for 3 months.

      No, no, no. You guys do not understand that this will not work AT ALL. We only have a small amount of users who fit the requirements to vote on mods, along with even less users who can actually be a mod. Limiting the entire community's voice for the wiki's biggest public space is completely backwards. 

      Also, we have to consider what kind of users actually meet these requirements. Are they mature? Are they users who will enforce the rules? Are the regulars on chat? Do they behave like little kids in bad situations? All of these are major factors in deciding mods, since a mod who sucks at their job or is a major dick is even worst than a user who breaks the rules.

      My suggestion is to allow ALL users to vote, since the chat is a community central then the community should vote on who should represent their community. As for mods, asking for 500 edits is a major stretch for someone who is moderating a chat room and not the website. Those high amount of edits make more sense for rollbacks or admins, who work specifically on site quality. But not users who are watching people in a chat. I think any user who has been here for 1-3 months along with 50+ edits would be more sufficent. Since one of those edits are most likely their profile, and the rest are site contributions. Which show they care about the site just a little bit.

      As for nominations. I nominate myself, if that is allowed. I have been a mod for the creepypasta network, being a chat and site mod for The Creepypasta Wiki, Spinpasta Wiki, and the dysfunct Spnpasta wiki. Over the course of a year in collective time. As for other users, I currently have no nominations of the time being. Thank you for taking notice of the chat btw. 

      Edit: Just realized I dont meet either current requirement. I guess I have no nominations.

        Loading editor
    • Devincooper64 wrote:
      Please be sure that those users have 500+ edits or have been on here for 3 months. And people can only vote if they hae either 150 edits or have been on here for 3 months.No, no, no. You guys do not understand that this will not work AT ALL. We only have a small amount of users who fit the requirements to vote on mods, along with even less users who can actually be a mod. Limiting the entire community's voice for the wiki's biggest public space is completely backwards. 

      Also, we have to consider what kind of users actually meet these requirements. Are they mature? Are they users who will enforce the rules? Are the regulars on chat? Do they behave like little kids in bad situations? All of these are major factors in deciding mods, since a mod who sucks at their job or is a major dick is even worst than a user who breaks the rules.

      My suggestion is to allow ALL users to vote, since the chat is a community central then the community should vote on who should represent their community. As for mods, asking for 500 edits is a major stretch for someone who is moderating a chat room and not the website. Those high amount of edits make more sense for rollbacks or admins, who work specifically on site quality. But not users who are watching people in a chat. I think any user who has been here for 1-3 months along with 50+ edits would be more sufficent. Since one of those edits are most likely their profile, and the rest are site contributions. Which show they care about the site just a little bit.

      As for nominations. I nominate myself, if that is allowed. I have been a mod for the creepypasta network, being a chat and site mod for The Creepypasta Wiki, Spinpasta Wiki, and the dysfunct Spnpasta wiki. Over the course of a year in collective time. As for other users, I currently have no nominations of the time being. Thank you for taking notice of the chat btw. 

      Edit: Just realized I dont meet either current requirement. I guess I have no nominations.


      #DevinCooper4ChatMod

      Exceptions can be made, you know.

        Loading editor
    • As for rules. You need a rule for spam. I know multiple users who will post lines of text, links, or just random letters constantly and it really floods up the chat badly. It makes it hard to carry converstation because this spam breaks the flow of the chat and gets in the way of people who just want to talk to one another. 

        Loading editor
    • Devincooper64 wrote:
      As for rules. You need a rule for spam. I know multiple users who will post lines of text, links, or just random letters constantly and it really floods up the chat badly. It makes it hard to carry converstation because this spam breaks the flow of the chat and gets in the way of people who just want to talk to one another. 

      Symbol support vote Support

        Loading editor
    • I guess I'll cut the chat mod requirement to 250 edits. And I'll let everybody vote.

        Loading editor
    • Superluigi6 wrote:
      I guess I'll cut the chat mod requirement to 250 edits. And I'll let everybody vote.

      That still feels really high, what is your reasoning for the vast amount of edits for an on-chat position? 

        Loading editor
    • Devincooper64 wrote:
      Superluigi6 wrote:
      I guess I'll cut the chat mod requirement to 250 edits. And I'll let everybody vote.
      That still feels really high, what is your reasoning for the vast amount of edits for an on-chat position? 

      I think at the most it shoud be 150+ and that more than half should be actual wiki things, not blog edits, profile, etc.

        Loading editor
    • Lizington wrote:
      Devincooper64 wrote:
      Superluigi6 wrote:
      I guess I'll cut the chat mod requirement to 250 edits. And I'll let everybody vote.
      That still feels really high, what is your reasoning for the vast amount of edits for an on-chat position? 
      I think at the most it shoud be 150+ and that more than half should be actual wiki things, not blog edits, profile, etc.

      I can dig 150

        Loading editor
    • Devincooper64 wrote:
      Lizington wrote:
      Devincooper64 wrote:
      Superluigi6 wrote:
      I guess I'll cut the chat mod requirement to 250 edits. And I'll let everybody vote.
      That still feels really high, what is your reasoning for the vast amount of edits for an on-chat position? 
      I think at the most it shoud be 150+ and that more than half should be actual wiki things, not blog edits, profile, etc.
      I can dig 150

      Oh and I do think Devin should be nominated as well.

      Edit:dang I just realized that Devin can't.

        Loading editor
    • I'll keep 250 edits. If they don't get to 250 edits but they are above 3 months then an exception can be made.

      Anyways, get voting! Currently only one person is nominated.

        Loading editor
    • Lizington wrote:
      Devincooper64 wrote: I can dig 150
      Oh and I do think Devin should be nominated as well.

      Edit:dang I just realized that Devin can't.

      Assuming that Luigi would accept 150, I'd be 100 short. :/

        Loading editor
    • Devincooper64 wrote:
      Lizington wrote:
      Devincooper64 wrote: I can dig 150
      Oh and I do think Devin should be nominated as well.

      Edit:dang I just realized that Devin can't.

      Assuming that Luigi would accept 150, I'd be 100 short. :/

      Keep at it! You'll be nominated in no time.

        Loading editor
    • Lizington wrote:
      Devincooper64 wrote:
      Lizington wrote:
      Devincooper64 wrote: I can dig 150
      Oh and I do think Devin should be nominated as well.

      Edit:dang I just realized that Devin can't.

      Assuming that Luigi would accept 150, I'd be 100 short. :/
      Keep at it! You'll be nominated in no time.

      Well, luigi put the hammer down on 150. So id have to get over 140 edits if I wanted to be nominated. 

        Loading editor
    • If there is a lack of users who are nominated then I'll count you in Devin.

        Loading editor
    • Superluigi6 wrote:
      If there is a lack of users who are nominated then I'll count you in Devin.

      Heh, yeaaah. ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ

        Loading editor
    • Superluigi6 wrote:
      If there is a lack of users who are nominated then I'll count you in Devin.

      Sounds good, meanwhile I'll just work on my edit count I guess.

        Loading editor
    • I would nonimate myself(but Ima first try to be on more) but I think Devin would be awesome as a chat moderator. #voteforDevin!

        Loading editor
    • Symbol support vote Support DEVIN,ALL THE WAY! :D

      1. Devinforchatmod!
        Loading editor
    • Guys, while you can vote for others, you can vote for as many people as you'd like that you think would qualify, including yourself.

        Loading editor
    • I'll see if I can find anyone. The two users I was interested in nominating don't qualify :/

        Loading editor
    • I support anyone who can stop spam and inappropriate content in chat!

        Loading editor
    • Superluigi6 wrote:
      Guys, while you can vote for others, you can vote for as many people as you'd like that you think would qualify, including yourself.

      In that case, i vote Devin and Luvinx and me xD

        Loading editor
    • Luvinex and NeonClovers for me, if they qualify. 

        Loading editor
    • Lizington wrote:
      I honestly think Lilduders would make a great CM, but he/she(Idon'tknowduder'sgenderqwq) might not want it,,

      (Female ^.^) Thank you for considering me. However, since I don't go on the chat much and there are users who go on the chat far more than I do, I'll have to say no to being nominated. Good luck to everyone else! We definitely need more chat mods now! Heh, I remember when the chat was being debated for removal from the wiki due to nobody using it. This is a nice change of pace.

        Loading editor
    • StevenShield deserves the job most of all. He's the guy who usually reports all of this crap. I find such links to be dispicable, immoral, and, most of all, unbefitting such a gentle and family-oriented shows.

        Loading editor
    • I vote for Luvinex and NeonClovers! :D

      ( Also, if I can, am I allowed to vote for myself? )

        Loading editor
    • Purplecoal wrote:

      ( Also, if I can, am I allowed to vote for myself? )

      Probably not, but I definitely think you'd befit the task.

        Loading editor
    • Purplecoal wrote:

      ( Also, if I can, am I allowed to vote for myself? )

      Yes, it is allowed.

        Loading editor
    • My final votes:

      1.) StevenShield

      2.) PurpleCoal

      3.) NeonClovers

      4.) Dylanrules22

        Loading editor
    • Okay then, final votes:

      1. NeonClovers

      2. Luvinex

      3. Myself

      4. DevinCooper (If (s)he is allowed later on)

        Loading editor
    • I would nominate myself but that might be cheating

        Loading editor
    • My Votes For Chat Moderator:

      1. PurpleCoal

      2. DevinCooper64 (very mature and deserves it)

      3. Judgekoo

      NeonClovers, Luvinix17, MoonRabbit1, DylanRules22 don't meet the requirements, and therefore isn't qualified.

        Loading editor
    • Sticks the Badger wrote:
      My Votes For Chat Moderator:

      1. PurpleCoal

      2. DevinCooper64 (very mature and deserves it)

      3. Judgekoo

      NeonClovers, Luvinix17, MoonRabbit1, DylanRules22 don't meet the requirements, and therefore isn't qualified.

      Uh let me remindnyou,i haven't posted any innapropiate links/pics, i don't spam,and i need about 40 something edits left. Plus i'm VERY active on the chat,like almost everyday you'll see my icon on the right corner. Anyways, My final votes are:

      1. Devin Symbol support vote Support definetly

      2.Purplecoal (Make a great one :D )

      3. Me(i can get 150+ edits,trust me)

      4.Luv(verry serious about rules)

        Loading editor
    • Wait, do you need 150+ edits or 250+ edits? If its 150 then yah i can qualify,if 250 then replace my name with mage in my list

        Loading editor
    • 250+ edits according to Luigi.

        Loading editor
    • NeonClovers wrote:
      Sticks the Badger wrote:
      My Votes For Chat Moderator:

      1. PurpleCoal

      2. DevinCooper64 (very mature and deserves it)

      3. Judgekoo

      NeonClovers, Luvinix17, MoonRabbit1, DylanRules22 don't meet the requirements, and therefore isn't qualified.

      Uh let me remindnyou,i haven't posted any innapropiate links/pics, i don't spam,and i need about 40 something edits left. Plus i'm VERY active on the chat,like almost everyday you'll see my icon on the right corner. Anyways, My final votes are:

      1. Devin Symbol support vote Support definetly

      2.Purplecoal (Make a great one :D )

      3. Me(i can get 150+ edits,trust me)

      4.Luv(verry serious about rules)

      Hate to break it to you, but...

      "To become a Rollback, Image Controller, or Chat Moderator you need to have been on this wiki for 3 months."

      You haven't been on the wiki for 3 months, so once again, you're not qualified.


        Loading editor
    • I've been here sine june 4 2014

        Loading editor
    • Superluigi6 wrote:
      I'll keep 250 edits. If they don't get to 250 edits but they are above 3 months then an exception can be made.

      Anyways, get voting! Currently only one person is nominated.

      So you're saying theres a chance?!

        Loading editor
    • Gamrman3000 wrote:
      Superluigi6 wrote:
      I'll keep 250 edits. If they don't get to 250 edits but they are above 3 months then an exception can be made.

      Anyways, get voting! Currently only one person is nominated.

      So you're saying theres a chance?!

      Pretty much!

        Loading editor
    • Purplecoal wrote:
      I vote for Luvinex and NeonClovers! :D

      ( Also, if I can, am I allowed to vote for myself? )

      (insert the support thing here) I agree, you should nominate Purplecoal.

        Loading editor
    • Hmm. It would be kinda cool to be in a chat mod/admin position on two wikis. I would nominate myself if that's allowed.

      I nominate Judgekoo.

        Loading editor
    • 1. PurpleCoal

      2. NeonClovers (if they can get it if not than JudgeKoo)

      3. myself

      4. Devincooper64

        Loading editor
    • Myself!                                                                                                                                      There IS a chance right?!

        Loading editor
    • I suppose now is as good a time as any to volunteer. Also, give a chance to: Purple Coal Devin Cooper The Mage NeonClovers

      They're always on and pretty reasonable guys.

        Loading editor
    • Lilduders. I always see him on chat. And Neon clovers. They seem like responsible people.

        Loading editor
    • Luis G Cx wrote:
      Lilduders. I always see him on chat. And Neon clovers. They seem like responsible people.

      Please note that NeonClovers hasn't met the proper requirements, yet.

        Loading editor
    • Sticks the Badger wrote:
      Luis G Cx wrote:
      Lilduders. I always see him on chat. And Neon clovers. They seem like responsible people.
      Please note that NeonClovers hasn't met the proper requirements, yet.

      Acceptions could be made. NeonClovers has 114 edits, they only need 36 more. Yes, they have been on for roughly two months, but they're also nearing three months. So, NeonClovers could be nominated.

        Loading editor
    • Lizington wrote:
      Sticks the Badger wrote:
      Luis G Cx wrote:
      Lilduders. I always see him on chat. And Neon clovers. They seem like responsible people.
      Please note that NeonClovers hasn't met the proper requirements, yet.
      Acceptions could be made. NeonClovers has 114 edits, they only need 36 more. Yes, they have been on for roughly two months, but they're also nearing three months. So, NeonClovers could be nominated.

      "If they don't get to 250 edits but they are above 3 months then an exception can be made."

      Personally, I don't think she's ready to become a Chat Moderator.

        Loading editor
    • Lizington wrote:

      Sticks the Badger wrote:
      Luis G Cx wrote:
      Lilduders. I always see him on chat. And Neon clovers. They seem like responsible people.
      Please note that NeonClovers hasn't met the proper requirements, yet.

      Acceptions could be made. NeonClovers has 114 edits, they only need 36 more. Yes, they have been on for roughly two months, but they're also nearing three months. So, NeonClovers could be nominated.

      Is NeonClovers multiple users?

        Loading editor
    • Evtini200 wrote:

      Lizington wrote:


      Sticks the Badger wrote:
      Luis G Cx wrote:
      Lilduders. I always see him on chat. And Neon clovers. They seem like responsible people.
      Please note that NeonClovers hasn't met the proper requirements, yet.
      Acceptions could be made. NeonClovers has 114 edits, they only need 36 more. Yes, they have been on for roughly two months, but they're also nearing three months. So, NeonClovers could be nominated.
      Is NeonClovers multiple users?

      No, I don't know NeonClovers' gender, so I refer to them with non-gender pronouns.

        Loading editor
    • Evtini200 wrote:

      Lizington wrote:

      Sticks the Badger wrote:
      Luis G Cx wrote:
      Lilduders. I always see him on chat. And Neon clovers. They seem like responsible people.
      Please note that NeonClovers hasn't met the proper requirements, yet.
      Acceptions could be made. NeonClovers has 114 edits, they only need 36 more. Yes, they have been on for roughly two months, but they're also nearing three months. So, NeonClovers could be nominated.
      Is NeonClovers multiple users?

      What? Please stay on-topic.

        Loading editor
    • Can I nominate myself?

        Loading editor
    • Feedler wrote:
      Can I nominate myself?

      Yes, yes you can :)

        Loading editor
    • Sadly , little do people know .. I do exist on the wiki, and do a lot for it. So much that I rarely get on the chat, which is where a majority of relationships are founded. I highly do want my posistion, it's just that nobody really in the community knows me so It'll be hard to actually get voted rather someone they see everyday.

        Loading editor
    • Sticks the Badger wrote:
      Evtini200 wrote:

      Lizington wrote:


      Sticks the Badger wrote:
      Luis G Cx wrote:
      Lilduders. I always see him on chat. And Neon clovers. They seem like responsible people.
      Please note that NeonClovers hasn't met the proper requirements, yet.
      Acceptions could be made. NeonClovers has 114 edits, they only need 36 more. Yes, they have been on for roughly two months, but they're also nearing three months. So, NeonClovers could be nominated.
      Is NeonClovers multiple users?
      What? Please stay on-topic.

      He is being on topic, I kept referring to NeonClovers as "they"

        Loading editor
    • Feedler wrote:
      Sadly , little do people know .. I do exist on the wiki, and do a lot for it. So much that I rarely get on the chat, which is where a majority of relationships are founded. I highly do want my posistion, it's just that nobody really in the community knows me so It'll be hard to actually get voted rather someone they see everyday.

      Also, I do see you quite a bit as well, I wanted to nominate multiple people, but I forgot to.

      (whispers)

      (#nominatefeedler)

        Loading editor
    • (whispers)

      (thanks, i'd nominate you, but..you are a patroller...)

        Loading editor
    • Feedler wrote:
      (whispers)

      (thanks, i'd nominate you, but..you are a patroller...)

      (whispers)

      (lol, i suck at this job anyway)

        Loading editor
    • Lizington wrote:
      Sticks the Badger wrote:
      Evtini200 wrote:

      Lizington wrote:


      Sticks the Badger wrote:
      Luis G Cx wrote:
      Lilduders. I always see him on chat. And Neon clovers. They seem like responsible people.
      Please note that NeonClovers hasn't met the proper requirements, yet.
      Acceptions could be made. NeonClovers has 114 edits, they only need 36 more. Yes, they have been on for roughly two months, but they're also nearing three months. So, NeonClovers could be nominated.
      Is NeonClovers multiple users?
      What? Please stay on-topic.
      He is being on topic, I kept referring to NeonClovers as "they"

      That has nothing to do with the subject in general.

        Loading editor
    • Lizington wrote:

      (whispers)

      (lol, i suck at this job anyway)

      Then why are you even a Patroller in the first place?

        Loading editor
    • They were making a joke. @Sticks the Badger

        Loading editor
    • Sticks the Badger wrote:
      Lizington wrote:

      (whispers)

      (lol, i suck at this job anyway)

      Then why are you even a Patroller in the first place?

      I was making a joke. 

        Loading editor
    • Purplecoal and Neon totally deserve it! :D

        Loading editor
    • I feel like a lot of people are also forgeting that there are longevity requirements too. They have to be here for at least a month, rarely ever an exception. Some of my picks:

      1. PurpleCoal

      2.JudgeKoo

        Loading editor
    • Purple and Judge for the position, comrades!

        Loading editor
    • Wow... No one realized about me... I am very active in the chat(Except school days). It is like if you enter the chat, you will find me in there.

      1. VoteForMyselfEvenItSeemsImpossibleNow

      SoManyBirthdaysPreview10Finn Manusia MalaysiaLapis healed 16:09, March 15, 2015 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • Make the Chat Mods in different Timezone. It will be Chat Mod intire day.

        Loading editor
    • So the way things are looking now is that either Killer and I will pick one or two more chat mods, and then after a week we will have a vote based off of your nominations and the top two will become chat mods.

      So keep voting!

        Loading editor
    • I think my final vote is Purple,Judge and Devin


      edit: and Finn 

        Loading editor
    • My votes:

      1. Judge, I feel he is responsible, he is very active, mature, and well deserved of his posistion, and he meets all the requirements.

      2. Me, shamelessly enough to say, I nominate myself. I think i'm well deserved of the posistion and could suit it responsibly and take the posistion itself responsibly.

      3. FinnManusia, He is great, I would see him perfectly fit for this posistion as he highly deserves it, He definetly has my vote for the future.

      Potential Votes:

      1. PurpleCoal, I do see him a lot and they seem friendly and responsible but until I know them on a personal manor and she how they would fit this posistion i'd just stick to not voting for them or not voting against.

      My not-votes:

      1. Devin, He doesn't reach many of the requirements, nor do I rarely see him. Neither on chat or on the wiki really adding that much, that doesn't mean he's not suitable, it just means that doesn't really reach my standards for a vote.

      2. NeonClovers, while I adore and L.O.V.E her, (and her cute Gemsona) she doesn't reach edit requirements, and don't think she'd be suited for this role, but maybe a different role. She is on chat a lot which is a plus for me, (I even RP'd with her before) but I just can't picture her as a Chatmod in my personal opinion

        Loading editor
    • From my observation, I only think of myself been Chat Mod... (2am to 6am and 8am to 12am-6pm)

      And these peoples: Judge (He in the chat from 4am to 7am and 9am to 12 am)

      Andrey Andrey (From about 6 am to 8 am and come back like 11am to 5 pm)

      I dont think Purple will be the Chat Mod (2 am to 5 am and 5 pm to 8 pm)

      I not too sure with Devin too (3pm to 9pm???)

      SoManyBirthdaysPreview10Finn Manusia MalaysiaLapis healed 16:44, March 15, 2015 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • Just another reminder: consider people who are active on the chatroom and talk while in the chatroom, because some people leave the chatroom open and go do something else (which I'm guilty to), and talking in the chatroom ensures that they are active and that they see everything.

      If I hire myself as a chat mod, and then one day I enter the chatroom, leave it open to do something else, when I'm out someone could come in, spam the chatroom, and then leave. Then after 10 minutes I'd come back and users would be telling me about the user, but I can't do anything about it now. We do not want that.

        Loading editor
    • I didn't vote for Finn cause I thought he already had some form of authority. I nominate him then as well.

        Loading editor
    • Evtini200 wrote:
      I didn't vote for Finn cause I thought he already had some form of authority. I nominate him then as well.

      Yes, same here.

        Loading editor
    • Pymien wrote:

      1. Devin, He doesn't reach many of the requirements, nor do I rarely see him. Neither on chat or on the wiki really adding that much, that doesn't mean he's not suitable, it just means that doesn't really reach my standards for a vote.

      It's your vote of course, and I know I don't reach the requirements. But I have been on the chat almost daily since joining, and I think most of the regulars to the chat can vouch on that one.

        Loading editor
    • Devincooper64 wrote:
      Pymien wrote:
      1. Devin, He doesn't reach many of the requirements, nor do I rarely see him. Neither on chat or on the wiki really adding that much, that doesn't mean he's not suitable, it just means that doesn't really reach my standards for a vote.
      It's your vote of course, and I know I don't reach the requirements. But I have been on the chat almost daily since joining, and I think most of the regulars to the chat can vouch on that one.

      May be so - I myself have never met you but it doesn't mean i'm not rooting for you. Just means I probably can't vouch/stand up for your vote.

        Loading editor
    • Evtini200 wrote:
      I didn't vote for Finn cause I thought he already had some form of authority. I nominate him then as well.

      Well, Andrey Andrey is an "Image Control" and he become "Chat Mod" now. He has the both position. http://steven-universe.wikia.com/wiki/StevenUniverse_Wiki:Rollbacks_and_Moderators

      SoManyBirthdaysPreview10Finn Manusia MalaysiaLapis healed 11:13, March 16, 2015 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • Sticks the Badger wrote:
      Luis G Cx wrote:
      Lilduders. I always see him on chat. And Neon clovers. They seem like responsible people.
      Please note that NeonClovers hasn't met the proper requirements, yet.

      And please note that there are OTHER users that ALSO haven,t met the proper requirements either. Ok my final votes are:

      1.Devin 

      2.Purplecoal

      3.Finn

      4.Mage

      To be honest, i dont care if devin or purple win,i just want one of those two to win. (Also,hope this thread isn't over...)

        Loading editor
    • NeonClovers wrote:
      (Also,hope this thread isn't over...)

      Well, we need at least 2-3 new chat mods.

        Loading editor
    • My vote still goes to JudgeKoo and PurpleCoal.

        Loading editor
    • I just started but don't worry I promise to follow the rules ;D anyways good to know the rules

        Loading editor
    • I'd like to be chat mod but I do not qualify at all, I only come maybe oce or twice a week, and barely edit.  I think that maybe Devincooper64 is good mod material.  But from what I have seen, the Steven Universe chat is well-behaved.  Good luck finding a mod.

        Loading editor
    • .Kitsune wrote:
      I'd like to be chat mod but I do not qualify at all, I only come maybe oce or twice a week, and barely edit.  I think that maybe Devincooper64 is good mod material.  But from what I have seen, the Steven Universe chat is well-behaved.  Good luck finding a mod.

      Devin seems nice and trustworthy, however, she does not meet the edit or longevity requirements. I stress anyone who wants to be or nominates somebody to check if they meet the requirements of 250 edits and 3 months (for chat mod, everything else under patroller is more).

        Loading editor
    • I think best CM would be Devincooper64 and Me becouse I think I am preety able for being a responcible prson. I will still try to get more Edits to be able to qualify myself. I am a big folower of rules and I will report everything against the rules. If you think I am able of being a CM than waste no time and vote ! :D O:)

        Loading editor
    • ODestroyer2002 wrote:
      I think best CM would be Devincooper64 and Me becouse I think I am preety able for being a responcible prson. I will still try to get more Edits to be able to qualify myself. I am a big folower of rules and I will report everything against the rules. If you think I am able of being a CM than waste no time and vote ! :D O:)

      While I agree with Devin being capable, you do not qualify sadly, give it some time, (a few months) and a few edits and you may be elidgble, but for now I say just be a wikian contributor ^-^

        Loading editor
    • If I still don't mee the requirements, and I am being ocnsidered by the majority vote. Give me a date when you will start voting for new mods, I should be able to get my edit count high enough through legitamate edits or farming. (Since you guys farmed for your positions anyways, and I know this for a fact.)

        Loading editor
    • Farming is a strong accusation. Although a large number of users are considering you for the vote, be careful not to make enemies by insulting the current chatmods.

      Anyways, as the person who originally suggested this forum, I have two things to say,

      1. Most of you have no experience ever being a chat mod, and therefore don't really know what it means to be able to be a chat mod. That being said, it doesn't take much to be an effective chat mod, especially when good chat rules are instated. One can not know if they are a rule follower until we have "real rules" for chat. Being a chat mod is all about proper judgement of a situation: knowing when to kick or ban, when to give warnings, and if you are banning someone how long will you ban them?

      2. I nominate FinnManusia, he is on chat all the time, friendly, and responsible.

        Loading editor
    • Forgot to mention, I am actually chat mod on the "Steven Universe Fanon" wikia chat, thanks for reminding me Tucky :)

        Loading editor
    • FinnManusia and DevinCooper seem like good mods

        Loading editor
    • .Kitsune wrote:
      FinnManusia and DevinCooper seem like good mods

      Again, qualifications (Devin).

        Loading editor
    •  

      I actually meet the qualifications for something. That's a first. Anyhow, my vote stays the same: Purple Coal, Mage, NeonClovers, DevinCooper and Finn. I'd even be willing to give an exception to Devin (granted, it's not my call).

        Loading editor
    • I'm a chat mod on the Steven Universe Roleplay Wiki.

        Loading editor
    • Evtini200 wrote:
       
      I actually meet the qualifications for something


      You qualify for Chat Moderator and Moderator.

        Loading editor
    • AwesomeSteven
      AwesomeSteven removed this reply because:
      No
      22:15, March 18, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • I've been on for over three months.

        Loading editor
    • Tuckyd wrote:
      Farming is a strong accusation. Although a large number of users are considering you for the vote, be careful not to make enemies by insulting the current chatmods.

      Anyways, as the person who originally suggested this forum, I have two things to say,

      1. Most of you have no experience ever being a chat mod, and therefore don't really know what it means to be able to be a chat mod. That being said, it doesn't take much to be an effective chat mod, especially when good chat rules are instated. One can not know if they are a rule follower until we have "real rules" for chat. Being a chat mod is all about proper judgement of a situation: knowing when to kick or ban, when to give warnings, and if you are banning someone how long will you ban them?

      2. I nominate FinnManusia, he is on chat all the time, friendly, and responsible.

      Oh, I meant no sour words. I have had at least two staff and another user admit to it. I personally don't think it's anything to be ashamed of becuase of the high edit counts that this site requires. I'm sorry if you felt as if I was trying to diss anyone, far from my intention.

      On the flipside, I was a mod for Creepypasta Wiki Chat before it's shut down in Janurary and am a current mod for Spinpasta Wiki. I have over 8 months of experience as a chat mod. I can also help develop rules for the chat to keep it at it's strongest and try not to combat some of the rules like I did the other day.

      This of course is assuming that I am granted an exception despite my edit count being 80 short of the current requirement :p

        Loading editor
    •  

      I just got kicked from the chat because of spam... pls help. ;-; I just wanted people to notice me, but nobody there did act like I was there... help .-.

        Loading editor
    • Luvinix17 wrote:
       
      I just got kicked from the chat because of spam... pls help. ;-; I just wanted people to notice me, but nobody there did act like I was there... help .-.

      Who kicked you and why? When was it?

      If it was yesterday, I had GarnetBot open for practically the whole day (about 3pm to 9pm).

        Loading editor
    • Superluigi6 wrote:
      Luvinix17 wrote:
       
      I just got kicked from the chat because of spam... pls help. ;-; I just wanted people to notice me, but nobody there did act like I was there... help .-.
      Who kicked you and why? When was it?

      If it was yesterday, I had GarnetBot open for practically the whole day (about 3pm to 9pm).

      LapisLazuli1, it was today, about 30min ago, or 50min. ;-;

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.