FANDOM


  • AwesomeSteven
    AwesomeSteven closed this thread because:
    Pearl is Awsome is no longer inactive
    11:09, April 21, 2015

    As many of you know, Pearl is awsome is a buro on our wiki. However, she has not edited since January 4th. One time in December when she was on a hiatus, she stated that she was gone because she had a 104*F fever, so I hope that's not the case this time. 

    I advise that only people who joined in 2014 should vote, excluding admins and patrollers.

    Support:

    13

    Oppose:

    0

      Loading editor
    • That's a LONG time...

        Loading editor
    • I thought it should be Support/Oppose poll?

      We don't need anonymous votes. A lot of people doesn't even know the situation.

        Loading editor
    • No one knows the situation except for a few people.

        Loading editor
    • Andrey Andrey wrote:
      I thought it should be Support/Oppose poll?

      We don't need anonymous votes. A lot of people doesn't even know the situation.

      That doesnt matter because this is about demoting her because of her inactivity which is cleary stated in the original post

        Loading editor
    • Please don't make it anonymous vote. Make it Symbol support vote Support or whatever Symbol oppose vote Oppose

        Loading editor
    • Peridot The Techtition wrote: No one knows the situation except for a few people.

      Really? I thought it was like at least 50

        Loading editor
    • Symbol support vote Support

        Loading editor
    • I joined one and a half month ago so I won't vote. I'm just commenting for the sake of commenting to be honest. Sorry about that. Although if it's just for inactivity it seems pretty useless. But since it's said that "A lot of people don't know the situation" I suppose there's more behind it that I don't know of.

        Loading editor
    •  [1] Support 

        Loading editor
    • She said that she promoted Peridot to be her successor and that she was too sick to continue, so I think we should leave a message on her wall asking her if this is still the case and if she could demote herself if it is. It would save some unneeded troubles if Pearl actually wants to not be a buro anymore.

        Loading editor
    • After Peridot demoted herself, Pearl is Awsome actually re-promoted her. (S)he can do the same if Wikia demotes Peridot. Does that mean Pearl is Awsome will have to be demoted in order for Peridot to be demoted?

        Loading editor
    • The reasoning I'm saying this is no one knows what is happening with her.

        Loading editor
    • Lilduders wrote:
      She said that she promoted Peridot to be her successor and that she was too sick to continue, so I think we should leave a message on her wall asking her if this is still the case and if she could demote herself if it is. It would save some unneeded troubles if Pearl actually wants to not be a buro anymore.

      I did leave a message on her wall way before Peridot became buero.

        Loading editor
    • Vogel100 wrote:
      After Peridot demoted herself, Pearl is Awsome actually re-promoted her. (S)he can do the same if Wikia demotes Peridot. Does that mean Pearl is Awsome will have to be demoted in order for Peridot to be demoted?

      Source for this?

        Loading editor
    • I remember her when making edits when I frist joined but I wasnt very activite in the community so I dont know why she is inactive.  Eitherway innactive is innactive, it doesnt matter why.  I Symbol support vote Support this but we should keep the possition open if she decides to come back.

        Loading editor
    • Superluigi6 wrote:
      Vogel100 wrote:
      After Peridot demoted herself, Pearl is Awsome actually re-promoted her. (S)he can do the same if Wikia demotes Peridot. Does that mean Pearl is Awsome will have to be demoted in order for Peridot to be demoted?
      Source for this?

      I checked Peridot's user rights management. This is weird. Why would Pearl come back just to repromote Peridot? If she is capable of that, then why would she not come back, or at least leave a message for us? If she is aware of this whole issue, then why is she still lurking in the shadows? She is a buro, after all. Something's up.

        Loading editor
    • Superluigi6 wrote:
      Vogel100 wrote:
      After Peridot demoted herself, Pearl is Awsome actually re-promoted her. (S)he can do the same if Wikia demotes Peridot. Does that mean Pearl is Awsome will have to be demoted in order for Peridot to be demoted?
      Source for this?

      http://steven-universe.wikia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=Peridot_The_Techtition&year=&month=-1

        Loading editor
    • Vogel100 wrote:

      Superluigi6 wrote:
      Vogel100 wrote:
      After Peridot demoted herself, Pearl is Awsome actually re-promoted her. (S)he can do the same if Wikia demotes Peridot. Does that mean Pearl is Awsome will have to be demoted in order for Peridot to be demoted?
      Source for this?

      http://steven-universe.wikia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=Peridot_The_Techtition&year=&month=-1

      Bam! [[1]]

        Loading editor
    • It isn't really my place to say, but I don't think Pearl is Awsome should be demoted...

        Loading editor
    • AwesomeSteven
      AwesomeSteven removed this reply because:
      Unneeded
      17:36, April 19, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • Vogel100
      Vogel100 removed this reply because:
      Since Ruby the Gem's off-topic reply was removed, I think it's best to remove this off-topic reply to Ruby the Gem's off-topic reply too.
      17:48, April 19, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • RubyTheGem wrote:
      I've been on the wiki for a month and my wish is to be a chat mod

      You still have a long way to go, and this is not the place to say this.

        Loading editor
    • But mysterious activity

        Loading editor
    • "I advise that only people who joined in 2014 should vote, excluding admins and patrollers."

      Why shoud the admins and patrollers not vote? I'm curious as to why they can't. (And I'm a patroller and I kinda wanted to vote quq)

        Loading editor
    • Lizington wrote:
      "I advise that only people who joined in 2014 should vote, excluding admins and patrollers."

      Why shoud the admins and patrollers not vote? I'm curious as to why they can't. (And I'm a patroller and I kinda wanted to vote quq)

      I think he means patrollers and admins that joined after 2014 can vote too.

        Loading editor
    • Vogel100 wrote:
      Lizington wrote:
      "I advise that only people who joined in 2014 should vote, excluding admins and patrollers."Why shoud the admins and patrollers not vote? I'm curious as to why they can't. (And I'm a patroller and I kinda wanted to vote quq)
      I think he means patrollers and admins that joined after 2014 can vote too.

      Maybe.

        Loading editor
    • Lizington wrote:
      Vogel100 wrote:
      Lizington wrote:
      "I advise that only people who joined in 2014 should vote, excluding admins and patrollers."Why shoud the admins and patrollers not vote? I'm curious as to why they can't. (And I'm a patroller and I kinda wanted to vote quq)
      I think he means patrollers and admins that joined after 2014 can vote too.
      Maybe.

      He voted too and he's an admin.

        Loading editor
    • TheMemeLord1337
      TheMemeLord1337 removed this reply because:
      didn't work
      18:47, April 19, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • ApplePy
      ApplePy removed this reply because:
      none
      19:24, April 19, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • AwesomeSteven wrote:
      As many of you know, Pearl is awsome is a buro on our wiki. However, she has not edited since January 4th. One time in December when she was on a hiatus, she stated that she was gone because she had a 104*F fever, so I hope that's not the case this time. 

      I advise that only people who joined in 2014 should vote, excluding admins and patrollers.

      You mean 2014 or before, right? Because I think I joined in 2013.

        Loading editor
    • Not to be rude, but if Pearl isn't going to give an answer then we'll have to hold a vote on this thread. I Symbol support vote Support Pearl's demotion as of now. I know she was a kind buro when she was active, but she hasn't been active in a while and we can't wait forever for her to come back. The wiki is bigger than its ever been and it needs the staff to be active to help moderate it, especially a staff with the highest position. I support this until Pearl decides to come back to this wiki in the future, if she does, and possibly become a buro again.

        Loading editor
    • (Just realized Ive offically been on the wiki for a year) If she does get demoted, I personally think she should get re promoted when she comes back.

        Loading editor
    • Since you just mentioned @Pearl is Awesome, I really do miss her, though. I haven't seen her for a very long while. )-:>

        Loading editor
    • Hmmmm

        Loading editor
    • .. She IS back. She re-promoted Peridot. I Symbol support vote Support 100%

        Loading editor
    • Pymien wrote: .. She IS back. She re-promoted Peridot. I Symbol support vote Support 100%

      Yeah, this may sound harsh, but maybe she is just being lazy

        Loading editor
    • I agree with Hypernova, Pearl is too good of a buro for us to simply demote her and not give her a change to earn it back. As for the matter for her re-promoting Peridot, Pearl may not know the entire situation so it's not her fault.

        Loading editor
    • Killer365 wrote:
      I agree with Hypernova, Pearl is too good of a buro for us to simply demote her and not give her a change to earn it back. As for the matter for her re-promoting Peridot, Pearl may not know the entire situation so it's not her fault.

      I find it really strange why she would come back and repromote Peridot, but do nothing else.

        Loading editor
    • It's probably because Peridot asked her. I don't know.

        Loading editor
    • Symbol support vote Support Her severe inactivity warrants a demotion. If she ever returns and becomes more active, perhaps her position could be restored?

        Loading editor
    • Symbol support vote Support Inactivity in this case, and promoting and repromoting a user without consent of the community warrants a demotion in my book.

        Loading editor
    • maybe she can't get into that account anymore and she is using an alternate account.

        Loading editor
    • She can definitely still access the Pearl is Awesome account, in fact she came on the wiki today to re-promote a user the community voted to demote.

        Loading editor
    • Tuckyd wrote:
      She can definitely still access the Pearl is Awesome account, in fact she came on the wiki today to re-promote a user the community voted to demote.

      Ok

        Loading editor
    • TheMemeLord1337
      TheMemeLord1337 removed this reply because:
      Fail
      00:32, April 20, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • Sticks the Badger
      Sticks the Badger removed this reply because:
      Wrong post.
      00:30, April 20, 2015
      This reply has been removed
    • RubyTheGem wrote:

      Tuckyd wrote:
      She can definitely still access the Pearl is Awesome account, in fact she came on the wiki today to re-promote a user the community voted to demote.

      Ok

      Symbol strong support vote Strongly support

        Loading editor
    • Edit: Sticks has no idea what theyre talking about it seems. As hell seems to = mild vulgar language. 

        Loading editor
    • CasaBlacka wrote: Lol, who the hell is Pearl

      Is that comment nessasary?

        Loading editor
    • Likeo35 wrote:

      CasaBlacka wrote: Lol, who the hell is Pearl

      Is that comment nessasary?

      Yeah, try to be more serious about this. You didn't even vote.

        Loading editor
    • Sticks the Badger wrote:

      Likeo35 wrote:

      CasaBlacka wrote: Lol, who the hell is Pearl

      Is that comment nessasary?

      Yeah, try to be more serious about this. You didn't even vote.

      Me?

        Loading editor
    • Symbol support vote Support

        Loading editor
    • Likeo35 wrote:

      Sticks the Badger wrote:

      Likeo35 wrote:

      CasaBlacka wrote: Lol, who the hell is Pearl

      Is that comment nessasary?
      Yeah, try to be more serious about this. You didn't even vote.
      Me?

      No, I'm speaking to Casa.

        Loading editor
    • Sticks the Badger wrote:

      Likeo35 wrote:

      Sticks the Badger wrote:

      Likeo35 wrote:

      CasaBlacka wrote: Lol, who the hell is Pearl

      Is that comment nessasary?
      Yeah, try to be more serious about this. You didn't even vote.
      Me?

      No, I'm speaking to Casa.

      Ok

        Loading editor
    • Why are you guys getting offended? Would you rather me make a throw away joke comment or do you want me to vote on an issue I have no idea about like some mindless person? 

      Let's think about it.

        Loading editor
    • CasaBlacka wrote: Why are you guys getting offended? Would you rather me make a throw away joke comment or do you want me to vote on an issue I have no idea about like some mindless person? 

      Let's think about it.

      More like you think about how people can take this, this thread is serious

        Loading editor
    • CasaBlacka wrote:
      Why are you guys getting offended? Would you rather me make a throw away joke comment or do you want me to vote on an issue I have no idea about like some mindless person? 

      Let's think about it.

      Or you could do neither...

        Loading editor
    • CasaBlacka wrote:
      Why are you guys getting offended? Would you rather me make a throw away joke comment or do you want me to vote on an issue I have no idea about like some mindless person? 

      Let's think about it.

      If you hadn't the slightest idea about the issue, why even comment?

        Loading editor
    • Because I felt like it, i don't know why you guys are getting worked up over a comment you could've just... not responded to? or ignored? or countinue to make a deal about it?

      Thats all im gonna say on such a stupid matter.

        Loading editor
    • CasaBlacka wrote:
      Because I felt like it, i don't know why you guys are getting worked up over a comment you could've just... not responded to? or ignored? or countinue to make a deal about it?

      Thats all im gonna say on such a stupid matter.

      Nonetheless, your comment seemed a bit off-topic, which isn't what we need at a time like this.

        Loading editor
    • Sticks the Badger wrote:

      CasaBlacka wrote:
      Because I felt like it, i don't know why you guys are getting worked up over a comment you could've just... not responded to? or ignored? or countinue to make a deal about it?

      Thats all im gonna say on such a stupid matter.

      Nonetheless, your comment seemed a bit off-topic, which isn't what we need at a time like this.

      Yeah

        Loading editor
    • Symbol support vote Support I liked her and all, but she's hasn't been on forever. We need to let other people in if she jus just gonna do nothing.

        Loading editor
    • Symbol support vote Support - The reason of being inactive alone stands for demoting her possibly until she returns. Not coming back after awhile yet coming by only to promote someone is rather odd, though, and not comforting if it's done again for the person who is being voted to be demoted by Wikia.

        Loading editor
    • [1] Support, Even though that I really miss her. She is a close friend to me and anyone who support her. Hope you come back soon Pearl. I wish you were here to see this what happend here in Wikia. Get well soon.

      P.S.

      Thank you AwesomeSteven for remind me for this and all the users/admins. I'll see ya around.

      -Amadeo.lucero.9

        Loading editor
    • Symbol support vote Support

      Yeah, from this time... She is the one greeting me when I came this Wiki.


      SoManyBirthdaysPreview10Finn Manusia MalaysiaLapis healed 09:41, April 20, 2015 (UTC)

        Loading editor
    • Pictogram voting comment Comment

      If she will lose the position, she can be promoted again when she becomes more active.
      Also, if she comes back now, she won't be demoted at all.

        Loading editor
    • Can I explain to you guys one thing she probably had some personal problems I don't think a Buro would just walk away from her position an leave it unchecked without someone keeping up thing.

        Loading editor
    • Peridot The Techtition wrote:
      Can I explain to you guys one thing she probably had some personal problems I don't think a Buro would just walk away from her position an leave it unchecked without someone keeping up thing.

      That is definitely not true. There are lots of bureaucrats that just don't feel like contributing to the wiki anymore after a while on lots of wikis. Not saying Pearl is one of those people, just saying that it definitely happens.

        Loading editor
    • Again, it is her inactivity coupled with her reckless promotions that I believe warrant her demotion on this thread.

        Loading editor
    • It's understandable if she's having problems, but a bureaucrat needs to be active on the wiki. It's okay if she is demoted until she comes back; if it's what the voting board decides, she can be a buro again once she's consistently around and making edits again.

        Loading editor
    • Tuckyd wrote:
      Again, it is her inactivity coupled with her reckless promotions that I believe warrant her demotion on this thread.

      There's only been one reckless promotion, hasn't there? Or did I miss something?

        Loading editor
    • You guys have no idea what is going on neither do I but seriously learn to back off and stop being bullies.Y'all are being a bunch of freaking bullies I can see this.

        Loading editor
    • Peridot The Techtition wrote:
      You guys have no idea what is going on neither do I but seriously learn to back off and stop being bullies.Y'all are being a bunch of freaking bullies I can see this.

      What's going on then?

        Loading editor
    • POA has just come back, and stated that she wants to help out again. Now if we do demote her and personally repromote her a day or two later this might cause some controversy.

      So I am against her demotion. We could always repromote her personally w/o vote but that might be bad.

      Symbol oppose vote Oppose

        Loading editor
    • Strange she comes back RIGHT when we are about to demote her.. fishy.

        Loading editor
    • Pymien wrote:
      Strange she comes back RIGHT when we are about to demote her.. fishy.

      My guess is Peridot talked to him/her about her demotion somewhere outside of this wiki, because Pearl is Awsome repromoted her only a few hours after she had demoted herself. The question is why. Once again, she demoted herself. Why did she ask Pearl to repromote her if she demoted herself? Or maybe my theory is just completely wrong. Then I have no idea what happened. Except if Pearl has been lurking in the shadows, observating the wiki but doing nothing, waiting for the moment that (s)he HAD to do something, for example when the person (s)he appointed as a successor got demoted.

        Loading editor
    • Vogel100 wrote:
      Pymien wrote:
      Strange she comes back RIGHT when we are about to demote her.. fishy.
      My guess is Peridot talked to him/her about her demotion somewhere outside of this wiki, because Pearl is Awsome repromoted her only a few hours after she had demoted herself. The question is why. Once again, she demoted herself. Why did she ask Pearl to repromote her if she demoted herself? Or maybe my theory is just completely wrong. Then I have no idea what happened. Except if Pearl has been lurking in the shadows, observating the wiki but doing nothing, waiting for the moment that (s)he HAD to do something, for example when the person (s)he appointed as a successor got demoted.

      Peridot was repromoted by Pearl to help out with the wiki while SL is on vacation.

        Loading editor
    • Lilduders wrote:
      Vogel100 wrote:
      Pymien wrote:
      Strange she comes back RIGHT when we are about to demote her.. fishy.
      My guess is Peridot talked to him/her about her demotion somewhere outside of this wiki, because Pearl is Awsome repromoted her only a few hours after she had demoted herself. The question is why. Once again, she demoted herself. Why did she ask Pearl to repromote her if she demoted herself? Or maybe my theory is just completely wrong. Then I have no idea what happened. Except if Pearl has been lurking in the shadows, observating the wiki but doing nothing, waiting for the moment that (s)he HAD to do something, for example when the person (s)he appointed as a successor got demoted.
      Peridot was repromoted by Pearl to help out with the wiki while SL is on vacation.


      Yes, but if (s)he was inactive then how did (s)he know Peridot was demoted? And (s)he wouldn't repromote Peridot if she didn't ask for it I think.

        Loading editor
    • We should demote Pearl is Awesome. We need an active Bureaucrat to help run the wiki.

        Loading editor
    • Lilduders wrote:

      Vogel100 wrote:
      Pymien wrote:
      Strange she comes back RIGHT when we are about to demote her.. fishy.
      My guess is Peridot talked to him/her about her demotion somewhere outside of this wiki, because Pearl is Awsome repromoted her only a few hours after she had demoted herself. The question is why. Once again, she demoted herself. Why did she ask Pearl to repromote her if she demoted herself? Or maybe my theory is just completely wrong. Then I have no idea what happened. Except if Pearl has been lurking in the shadows, observating the wiki but doing nothing, waiting for the moment that (s)he HAD to do something, for example when the person (s)he appointed as a successor got demoted.

      Peridot was repromoted by Pearl to help out with the wiki while SL is on vacation.

      The repromotion, keep in mind, was completely uncalled for and unnecessary

        Loading editor
    • Symbol support vote Support But we should re-premote her if she comes back, she was really nice.

        Loading editor
    • After reading the heading, I almost had a heart attack. i thought people made a forum to see if anyone else think that "Demoting Pearl is Awesome". It never actually occur to me that "Pearl Is Awsome" is a person,lol.  But srsly, does not contributing to the wiki be a crime and possibly get kicked out or banned?

        Loading editor
    • Gemmaniac wrote: After reading the heading, I almost had a heart attack. i thought people made a forum to see if anyone else think that "Demoting Pearl is Awesome". It never actually occur to me that "Pearl Is Awsome" is a person,lol.  But srsly, does not contributing to the wiki be a crime and possibly get kicked out or banned?

      It doesn't mean a ban, but Pearl is awesome just can't be here, anyways, there is atleast 100 inactive people, non of which are banned

        Loading editor
    • yep Symbol support vote Support

        Loading editor
    • Likeo35 wrote:

      Gemmaniac wrote: After reading the heading, I almost had a heart attack. i thought people made a forum to see if anyone else think that "Demoting Pearl is Awesome". It never actually occur to me that "Pearl Is Awsome" is a person,lol.  But srsly, does not contributing to the wiki be a crime and possibly get kicked out or banned?

      It doesn't mean a ban, but Pearl is awesome just can't be here, anyways, there is atleast 100 inactive people, non of which are banned

      oh...thanks for explaining then.

        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.